Next week’s gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia could reveal much about American political dynamics, particularly regarding the ongoing government shutdown. The outcomes might not only reflect voter sentiment over the candidates but also provide insights into public perception surrounding the standoff in Washington, D.C. However, for these elections to serve as a meaningful gauge, they must produce notable results.
Bill Wichterman, a former advisor to President George W. Bush, emphasizes that both parties are entrenched in their positions, leaving little hope for immediate resolution. “Let’s say it’s normally a 5-point win, and it turns out to be a 15-point win,” he explained, pondering the implications of a significant Democratic victory. Such an unexpected outcome would surely garner attention. On the contrary, if the results align with expected norms, then Republican lawmakers may not feel alarmed.
Currently, Democratic candidates Abigail Spanberger in Virginia and Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey hold leads over their Republican opponents, Winsome Earle-Sears and Jack Ciattarelli. With Election Day just a week away, the Republican contenders are trailing by less than 10 points. Historically, the minority party tends to perform well in gubernatorial races following a presidential election, a trend that doesn’t typically surprise. Wichterman notes, “A Democratic win in those two states? Does that freak out Republicans? No, they’re both blue states.” However, should Republican candidates achieve surprising victories, it would raise alarms for the Democrats, potentially stirring unrest within their ranks.
The shutdown began on October 1 when lawmakers failed to pass a Republican-led short-term spending bill. The Democratic leadership has repeatedly opposed this measure while urging Congress to consider extending COVID-era subsidies for Obamacare premiums. Meanwhile, Republicans have firmly rejected these requests, insisting the fiscal matters are unrelated.
Even amid the shutdown, it appears the state-level elections could proceed unaffected. The federal government plays a minimal role in administering state elections, which operate largely independently. For instance, grants provided by the Election Assistance Commission help states bolster their election systems but do not dictate the conduct of elections. Both New Jersey and Virginia have already secured relevant funding through the Help America Vote Act, totaling $272,700 for the upcoming electoral cycle.
Wichterman also indicates that the election results could influence reactions from the White House. If Congress remains stalemated after the election, President Donald Trump’s involvement could shift the political landscape. Currently, Trump has directed his focus elsewhere, as seen during his recent trip to Japan. “I think Democrats have been waiting for Trump to crack” on the shutdown, Wichterman noted, indicating that Republican optimism remains intact.
Democrats share similar sentiments, believing that the deadlock in Congress will persist until Trump takes a decisive role in negotiations. Senator Chris Van Hollen articulates this point: “He says, ‘Jump,’ they say, ‘How high?’ And so, he’s the one that needs to come to the table.” This highlights the significant influence Trump still has over party dynamics.
As the races approach, attention will likely turn to how the political atmosphere shifts in the wake of the elections. Outcomes that defy expectations could have ripple effects in Washington, altering the path of negotiations surrounding the government funding impasse. The interplay between state elections and broader national issues remains a crucial factor, one that will beg analysis in the days that follow.
"*" indicates required fields
