Former President Donald Trump has publicly backed Elon Musk, a move that underscores a significant partnership as both seek to reshape the federal government. Trump referred to Musk as a “very capable guy” and expressed ongoing admiration, stating, “I like Elon. I suspect I’ll always like Elon!” This moment of support came during a campaign event and highlights their alignment as Musk continues his ambitious overhaul of federal operations through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Taking charge of DOGE since January 2024, Musk has introduced some of the most drastic cost-cutting strategies seen in the U.S. government. By April, approximately 200,000 federal workers faced layoffs, early retirements, or were under review for termination. The objective is to reduce the government’s footprint by 30% and cut the deficit by a staggering $1 trillion next fiscal year. Musk and Trump frame these measures as vital for restoring financial discipline and national stability.
Musk’s aggressive strategy included dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which he criticized as “beyond repair.” The agency’s operations, which manage around $72 billion in global aid, have essentially been suspended. This involved staff reductions and the control of secure information systems by DOGE personnel, triggering significant pushback. Two USAID security officials were removed after seeking to prevent Musk’s team from accessing restricted areas. Trump noted the need for such changes, calling USAID “run by a bunch of radical lunatics.”
Despite Trump and Musk’s confidence, the moves have sparked considerable alarm among Democrats and foreign policy experts. They argue that halting vital programs could harm U.S. interests abroad. Senator Peter Welch described Musk’s access to sensitive federal databases as a “gross abuse of power.” However, Trump continues to reaffirm Musk’s authority within DOGE, pointing to early reports of cost savings as evidence of success.
DOGE claims to have saved taxpayers $140 billion through canceled contracts, asset disposals, and staffing cuts. Nonetheless, doubts regarding the transparency of these figures have arisen. During a public appearance, Musk warned of a looming “bankruptcy” for the U.S. if spending isn’t drastically cut. He urged Americans to “live within our means” and accept “temporary hardship” for long-term stability, stating, “Most importantly, we have to reduce spending. It will ensure long-term prosperity.”
Musk also acknowledged the potential initial economic crash linked to mass deportations under Trump’s immigration policy and significant budget cuts. He deemed such a fallout a necessary cost, declaring, “The price is worth it.” This candid admission reflects the bold economic revisions both figures are pursuing.
As Musk and Trump solidify their partnership, the focus remains on their radical economic strategy. Musk expressed the need to “rebuild from a sounder footing,” hinting at potential cuts to major programs like Social Security and the Department of Defense. Senator J.D. Vance confirmed that both areas are under review for possible savings.
The impact of these decisions is already being felt in the stock market. Government contractors have seen their stock values fluctuate in response to announcements from DOGE. Tesla shares dropped over 6% amid reports of Musk possibly leaving his position but rebounded nearly 5% following confirmation that he would remain in his role.
The ripple effects have reached political contests as well. In Wisconsin, a liberal Supreme Court candidate’s win against a conservative opponent was viewed by some as a backlash against Musk’s influence and Trump’s larger agenda. The White House downplayed the outcome, indicating that “Elon will depart public service… when his incredible work at DOGE is complete.”
Trump’s commitment to Musk goes beyond mere camaraderie; it’s rooted in a shared vision for America’s economic future. Trump has previously referred to Musk as one of the world’s “great geniuses” and compared him to historical figures like Thomas Edison, urging Americans to “cherish those people.”
As the 2024 election approaches, the contrasting views on proposed spending cuts become more pronounced. The promise to rein in government spending stands in stark relief against the backdrop of potential disruptions to crucial aid and public services that millions depend on. How Americans assess Musk’s notion of “temporary hardship” will likely influence the nation’s trajectory in the years to come.
"*" indicates required fields
