New Yorkers are at a crucial juncture. With the city facing deepening corruption and chaos, many residents feel the weight of ideological extremes. In this turbulent landscape, one voice stands out: Curtis Sliwa, a candidate presenting himself as a genuine alternative amidst the chaos.
Sliwa vividly recalls the warnings he issued in 2021 about the potential corruption under Mayor Eric Adams—warnings that many dismissed. Now, with a series of scandals involving resignations and criminal charges within the administration, Sliwa’s concerns seem eerily prescient. He paints a grim picture of City Hall: “Basic services fell behind while hardworking New Yorkers paid the price,” he asserts. His focus on results is clear; he believes the current leadership has failed the people it is supposed to serve.
Among Sliwa’s key criticisms is his assessment of former Governor Andrew Cuomo, who he claims played a significant role in the city’s growing crime issues through misguided reforms. Sliwa argues that Cuomo’s policies ushered in a series of failures, from bail reform to rent laws that hurt small landlords. This leads him to a blunt conclusion: Cuomo and his opponent, Zohran Mamdani, represent two sides of the same failing coin. Both advocate for policies, Sliwa argues, that ultimately lead to “higher costs, weaker safety, and ideology over common sense.” Such rhetoric resonates with voters who feel overwhelmed by rising expenses and unsafe streets.
Sliwa positions himself as a hands-on, experienced candidate. He emphasizes his long history in New York City, claiming to have patrolled its streets for over 45 years and founded the Guardian Angels to support those in need. He contrasts this with a political arena he sees as increasingly out of touch. His assertion, “If you do nothing, that just empowers the gangsters,” encapsulates his commitment to taking action rather than standing on the sidelines.
Public safety sits at the forefront of his campaign. Sliwa proposes hiring 7,000 police officers, funded by cutting waste in city budgets. He emphasizes his intention to cleanse the NYPD of political favoritism and to create a law enforcement environment focused on merit and leadership. This plan, paired with a commitment to make the city more affordable through tax cuts and bureaucratic reforms, aims to alleviate the financial pressure felt by many families.
Education is another critical issue for Sliwa. He points out that while New York City spends a staggering $42,000 per student, many fail to meet basic academic standards. Sliwa advocates for a reassessment of the entire education system, calling for a reduction in bureaucratic layers and an allocation of resources directly to classrooms. He proposes creating parent-controlled education accounts that would allow families to access educational funds for various approved purposes, including the option of sending their children to private schools. His emphasis on parental choice reflects a desire for a more tailored approach to education, enabling families to seek the best learning environments for their children.
Beyond safety and education, Sliwa addresses quality of life concerns for New Yorkers. He vows to enhance cleanliness in the city, proposing to remove illegal vendors, tackle unregulated smoke shops, and reclaim the subway system for regular riders. This attention to everyday issues illustrates a commitment to making the city livable in practical, tangible ways.
Sliwa’s strategy includes a promise of accountability. He plans to implement a citywide performance dashboard for transparency, allowing New Yorkers to see which government initiatives are effective and which are not. By opening the government’s books on contracts and auditing agencies, Sliwa aims to restore trust and integrity to city management.
Ultimately, Sliwa positions himself as the candidate of change, contrasting himself against what he describes as the failures of his opponents. He emphasizes the choice voters face in the upcoming election—not merely a selection between political parties but a decision about right versus wrong. “You don’t have to choose the lesser of two evils,” he insists. Sliwa’s message is clear: the path forward requires new leadership that prioritizes the needs of the people over the whims of political ideologies.
In a time where many feel disenfranchised, Curtis Sliwa’s campaign seeks to bridge the gap between politicians and the public. As he emerges as a contender in this highly charged race, New Yorkers are left to consider his vision and the possibility of real change for their city.
"*" indicates required fields
