Several attorneys representing January 6 defendants are appealing for public assistance to secure the full release of video and CCTV footage from that day. Their initiative is backed by a petition directed at the President and his administration, pushing for access to material that has remained largely inaccessible for over four years.
The American Rights Alliance, led by Attorneys Peter Ticktin, Evan Turk, and COO Treniss Evans, is driving this request. They argue that the footage should have been made available long ago, particularly in light of revelations that 274 FBI agents were present at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Questions linger about the role of these agents: were they undercover or simply on scene for crowd control? Vitali Gossjankowski, a former defendant and reported hostage, claims to have encountered several FBI agents in the crowd and found himself denied access to the footage that could aid his case.
The ongoing debate over the release of security footage from the Capitol has become a heated topic in American discourse. The initial promise of transparency has devolved into a complex situation involving competing narratives and numerous political players. In early 2023, former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy pledged to make over 40,000 hours of security footage publicly available. However, instead of fulfilling that promise, he allowed exclusive access to Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who broadcast selected clips that portrayed the Capitol events as predominantly peaceful. This move incited backlash from various political factions and media outlets, which demanded broader access to the material.
Following McCarthy’s departure from the Speakership in October 2023, Representative Mike Johnson took over and reiterated his commitment to transparency. In November 2023, he announced plans for the House Administration Committee to begin releasing the footage online, starting with 90 hours and promising to add nearly all of the 40,000 hours over time. Johnson emphasized the importance of allowing Americans to “see for themselves what happened that day.” By March 2024, the committee had made an additional 5,000 hours available, reversing an earlier decision to blur faces to speed up the release process.
The topic of transparency became even more critical when Rep. Barry Loudermilk revealed that the now-defunct January 6 Select Committee, led by Rep. Bennie Thompson, mishandled important documents and media. Loudermilk described the chaos his team encountered — disorganized boxes of raw data lacking an index or digital database, along with missing depositions. He stressed that the investigation into Capitol security failures appeared inadequate. “Nothing was indexed. There was no table of contents. We just got raw data,” he told Fox News Digital in August 2023.
Adding to the furor, the Select Committee had earlier announced it would share evidence with the Department of Justice but not necessarily with defendants. Thompson acknowledged that prosecutors were obliged to provide any exculpatory evidence, which raised fairness concerns for those facing charges related to January 6.
As of late 2024, several thousand hours of footage have been made available through a public website and viewing terminals, yet the entire archive remains incomplete. Johnson insists that the release is still in progress, while critics contend that the process has been hindered by political ramifications. Advocates for full disclosure argue that the footage is crucial for transparency. However, detractors warn that releasing it could jeopardize Capitol security and the safety of individuals involved.
Ultimately, the question of releasing the January 6 videos transcends party lines. Citizens should demand transparency and ponder why this critical footage has yet to be fully unveiled. While politicians often tout the term “transparency,” actual instances of achieving it remain infrequent. Unveiling the footage from that significant day is necessary to help the public grasp the truth behind the events of January 6.
"*" indicates required fields
