Scott Bessent Defends Trump Against “Punked” Claims: “Xi Had Respect in That Room”
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent took a strong stance this week against claims made by Democrats about President Trump’s recent meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. In a sharp rebuttal to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who claimed Trump got “punked,” Bessent emphasized there was “RESPECT” from Xi during their meeting in Busan, South Korea. This meeting was orchestrated to showcase the importance of U.S.-China relations against the backdrop of ongoing trade tensions.
Bessent stated, “The RESPECT Xi had for Trump was EVIDENT in the room,” assertively defending the former president’s negotiation skills. His remarks aired on Fox News and quickly circulated among conservative commentators, amplifying his position that Trump secured a “FANTASTIC deal for the US.” He went further, blaming critics for what he termed “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” This comment highlights a growing divide in perceptions of Trump’s dealings, particularly within the high-stakes arena of international diplomacy.
Trade Concessions and Tariff Rollbacks
The discussion quickly centered on the tangible outcomes of the summit. One significant result was the reduction of U.S. tariffs on Chinese-produced fentanyl precursors from 20% to 10%. This change is a critical step in addressing the fentanyl crisis affecting many American communities. In exchange, Xi vowed to enhance enforcement against smuggling, providing a direct response to a pressing public health issue.
Moreover, there was an agreement from China to resume substantial purchases of U.S. agricultural products, especially soybeans. This commitment includes a pledge to buy at least 25 million metric tons annually over the next three years, with shipments already in progress. Bessent described the boost in demand for American agriculture as “a shot of adrenaline,” signaling a return to a position of strength for farmers who have contended with tumultuous trade policies in recent years.
Rare Earth and Technology Policy
International relations often hinge on access to critical resources, and this summit reaffirmed that reality. The agreement to suspend rare earth export controls for a year is vital, as these minerals underpin U.S. manufacturing and technology sectors. Bessent highlighted the need to avoid a potential “materials Cold War,” which could have escalated tensions.
Trump, reflecting on the summit’s implications, called it a “global stabilization moment,” indicating the potential broad impact of these negotiations on global supply chains. However, concerns linger about technology and its implications for national security, particularly as U.S. companies like Nvidia gain greater access to Chinese markets. The debate continues, with some questioning potential risks involved in such collaborations.
Accusations and Political Fallout
Jeffries’ assertion about Trump being “punked” ignited a wave of backlash from conservative figures. Bessent denounced the accusation as politically charged and dishonest. He accused Democrats of sticking rigidly to their narratives, even at the expense of national interests. “Really disingenuous,” Bessent said, emphasizing his frustration. He noted that the Biden administration had enjoyed two years of unified control without taking significant steps to address issues like fentanyl or rare earth minerals, illustrating the contrast in leadership approaches.
Jeffries’ team pointed to unresolved matters, such as Chinese cooperation with Russia regarding oil and military actions near Taiwan, as broader geopolitical issues still hanging over the summit’s success. The focus on these concerns speaks to the complexities of international negotiations, where every deal has its concessions and lingering doubts.
Diplomatic Symbolism and Recognition
In a blend of diplomacy and recognition, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung bestowed Trump with the Grand Order of Mugunghwa, a substantial honor in South Korea. This gesture was not just a ceremonial award; it symbolizes a renewed perception of American leadership in the region, particularly concerning nuclear deterrence and regional stability. Additionally, Trump advanced a significant trade and defense agreement with South Korea, worth $350 billion, which includes a nuclear submarine initiative aimed at bolstering U.S. manufacturing and job creation.
Government Shutdown Continues
Amid these international dialogues, the U.S. faces a more pressing domestic challenge—the ongoing government shutdown. Now entering its fourth week, the shutdown has left over two million federal workers and military personnel in precarious financial situations. Reports of workers relying on food banks illustrate the gravity of the situation. While air traffic control operations have continued, safety concerns arise due to staffing shortages, raising questions about national stability at home.
Bessent labeled the shutdown an “international embarrassment,” attributing the blame to Democratic inaction and politics. “You don’t get to block border funding, sit on your hands for a month, and then lecture the president about leadership,” he remarked, underscoring a call for accountability among lawmakers during these pressing times.
When asked if the summit might create pressure for a resolution to the government shutdown, Bessent responded, “I think when Americans see real progress abroad—on soybeans, rare earth, fentanyl—they’re going to ask why Washington can’t handle what’s right in front of them at home.” This viewpoint emphasizes the desire for coherence between international success and domestic governance.
Analytical Takeaway
The Trump-Xi summit produced six clear outcomes:
- Fentanyl precursor tariffs reduced to 10%.
- China to purchase a minimum of 25 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans annually.
- Initial shipments of 12 million metric tons underway.
- One-year pause on China’s rare earth export restrictions.
- Increased access for U.S. semiconductor manufacturers.
- Trade and defense package with South Korea worth $350 billion.
These developments aim to mitigate longstanding U.S. concerns around trade imbalances and the stability of domestic markets. While the long-term implications of this summit on U.S.-China tensions remain to be seen, Bessent’s strong defense of Trump’s actions reflects a belief that this engagement marks a significant diplomatic and political achievement. As he noted, “There are facts. Facts are what you get when you show up, do deals, and walk away with something real. That’s what happened in Busan.”
"*" indicates required fields
