Jocelyn Benson, Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State, faces intense scrutiny, reminiscent of the skepticism often directed at the Clintons. Her reputation has taken a significant hit, as many view her as one of the most untrustworthy figures in the state’s election history. The recent campaign ad she released has only reinforced these negative perceptions.
The ad features an incident where Benson appears to ignore a young man attempting a trust fall, a symbolic representation of the trust voters in Michigan place in her. Instead of catching him, she walks away casually, sending a clear message that she cannot be depended upon. This moment has drawn sharp criticism, with many labeling it one of the worst decisions of her campaign, especially given the paramount importance of trust in political leadership.
Benson’s track record fuels the narrative that she is untrustworthy. She has been embroiled in numerous election-related lawsuits—69 to be exact—since taking office. Among these, notable are cases stemming from her directive to ignore signature matching on absentee ballots during the 2020 election, a move seen by many as undermining electoral integrity. Out of these lawsuits, she has lost five outright and had mixed results in others, suggesting a troubled tenure as the state’s chief election officer.
Not only does Benson have legal troubles, but her actions regarding ballot handling have raised eyebrows. There are serious questions about United States Postal Service workers in Detroit, who have reportedly stuffed multiple absentee ballots into drop boxes—an action Benson defended as “perfectly legal and normal.” Critics argue that her dismissal of these irregularities undermines the credibility of the election process.
Adding fuel to the fire, Benson’s claims about corporate-backed politicians seem contradictory, given the substantial financial support her own campaign has received from high-profile donors such as Stephen Ross and members of the Soros family. While she urges voters to trust her over corporate influences, her campaign’s financial ties tell a different story. Benson’s funding sources indicate that she is not insulated from the corporate support she criticizes in others.
Social media backlash has compounded her challenges. Users have responded with a series of memes and montages emphasizing her perceived dishonesty. Examples of users tearing apart her credibility underscore the growing discontent. “Joe Biden trusted her to ‘fortify’ Michigan in 2020,” one critic points out, drawing attention to the contentious atmosphere surrounding the elections at that time.
This combination of public perception, past actions, and questionable ad strategy paints a picture of a leader who struggles to connect with constituents. As the electoral landscape evolves, Benson’s reputation continues to tarnish, leaving many Michiganders wary of her motives and ability to lead. Her ability to regain the trust of voters moving forward appears increasingly doubtful.
"*" indicates required fields
