When Zohran Mamdani garnered attention last week, he stood outside the Islamic Cultural Center of the Bronx and emotionally recounted his aunt’s fears post-9/11. This personal reflection was bolstered by the presence of Debbie Almontaser, a Yemeni-American educator and former school principal known for her controversial history. Almontaser’s struggles resonate sharply within the broader narrative of Islamophobia, a theme that Mamdani and supporters often invoke.
Almontaser’s earlier conflict with the city over a T-shirt slogan deemed inflammatory transformed her into a symbol for Muslim American rights. Now serving as a senior advisor within Mamdani’s campaign network, she embodies the coalition rallying behind him. This group consists of over 110 political organizations defending Mamdani against accusations of extremism, particularly concerning his association with Siraj Wahhaj, a hardline imam.
Wahhaj’s contentious history, including support for controversial figures tied to past terrorism, presents a significant backdrop. His public rhetoric against America, labeling it “filthy and sick,” raises questions about the influences guiding Mamdani’s political identity. Despite financial and social ties among various Islamic organizations backing Mamdani, there exists a notable divergence in religious interpretation and approach among the different groups involved… Khoja Shia Muslims closely align politically with Sunni groups despite fundamental theological differences.
Mansour Al-Hadj, a researcher of Muslim political movements, describes this phenomenon as a “sophisticated fusion of religion, politics and identity.” This adaptation of political Islam in a democratic setting reveals a complex narrative, where community service has morphed into voter mobilization and candidate development.
Critiques of Mamdani often invoke the charged term “Islamophobia,” a label his supporters readily adopt to deflect criticism, even as some members of his network advocate for combative rhetoric. The Muslim American Society has issued statements against those who speak out about Mamdani, aligning their defense with accusations of systemic bias against Muslims and people of color.
At the forefront of this dynamic are figures like Mohammad Badawi, who blends calls for social justice with aggressive rhetoric against perceived oppressors, and Abdullah Akl, who has turned protests into fervent expressions of resistance. Their campaigns often intertwine the personal with the political, pushing narratives that are as much about faith as they are about activism.
This environment of heightened vocality and activism can become contentious when mingling with extremist ideologies. Groups such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) have faced scrutiny for their past affiliations and rhetoric as they pivot from watchdogs against discrimination to engaging in politically robust activism.
Mamdani himself appears caught between these influences, balancing progressive ideals with criticism of his supporters’ more radical positions. His connections, particularly with media figures like Mehdi Hasan, reveal how narratives around him are curated to bolster a particular image—one that appeals to the left while courting accusations of extremism.
The support from various religious leaders, including Khalid Latif and Yasir Qadhi—who possess polarizing records—further complicates Mamdani’s appeal. While these endorsements lend him credibility, they also associate him with figures whose past actions and statements could deter moderate voters.
Critics feel that Mamdani’s campaign exemplifies a broader trend: the rise of identity politics that emphasizes grievances and victimhood. As Al-Hadj notes, Mamdani and his supporters may be “banging a drumbeat of grievance” without representing the entire Muslim community. He argues that this rhetoric threatens to overshadow the pluralism that exists within Muslim identities in New York.
Whether Mamdani succeeds or faces defeat in the upcoming election, the implications of this coalition—embodied in the “Mamdani God Squad”—persist as a powerful illustration of how interconnected faith, political identity, and activism operate in a contemporary context. The echoes of Almontaser’s past and Mamdani’s current campaign intertwine, prompting ongoing dialogue about representation, extremism, and the multifaceted nature of New York’s Muslim community.
"*" indicates required fields
