In an unexpected turn of events, diverse political viewpoints converged over a crucial Middle East agreement credited to former President Donald Trump. On HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher, the host delivered a striking acknowledgment of Trump’s role in finalizing a peace deal between Israel and Hamas. This agreement, reached in early June 2024, marks a historical shift after years of relentless violence in Gaza.
Maher’s candid remarks emphasized the need for recognition: “You’ve gotta give credit where credit is due. I mean, a lot of people tried to pull this off. He did.” His comments reflect a rare moment of bipartisan support in a landscape often defined by stark divisions. The peace deal, negotiated with help from Egypt, was announced in Sharm el-Sheikh and includes a 20-point plan that outlines essential initial actions, such as the release of hostages and a structured withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.
Substance Over Optics
Traditionally, U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern negotiations has revolved around grand multi-party summits and a focus on consensus. Trump’s strategy took a different path, utilizing direct negotiations and bilateral agreements to yield results. Even critics of Trump have recognized the merit of this approach. Maher articulated this shift, saying, “He didn’t play the silly game in the Middle East like other presidents. The Jews love him more than ANY president, and the ARABS do too!” Such commentary underscores the effectiveness of Trump’s straightforward tactics.
The tweet capturing Maher’s remarks illustrated the significance of this breakthrough: “Trump didn’t play the silly game in the Middle East like other presidents… You gotta give it up for that!” The sentiment resonates deeply in a region long characterized by discord.
The immediate consequences of the agreement have been substantial:
- Hamas released the final 20 living Israeli hostages and the remains of those killed.
- Over 60,000 displaced Palestinians have begun to return home under safer conditions.
- Israeli forces completed a coordinated withdrawal from Gaza by June 10, under international observation.
For a region fraught with chaos and suffering, this agreement symbolizes a noteworthy step forward. Trump encapsulated this sentiment in his speech from Egypt, stating, “This breakthrough that we’re here to celebrate tonight is more than the end of the war in Gaza. With God’s help, it’ll be the new beginning for an entire beautiful Middle East.” His remarks reflect an optimistic vision for the future.
Policy and Strategic Implications
The agreement features a regional reconstruction fund, shaped by contributions from Gulf Arab nations, aimed at revitalizing infrastructure in Gaza. Israel has consented to allow aid and essential materials, under strict controls, monitored by U.S. and Egyptian inspectors. In return, Hamas has pledged to demilitarize significant sectors of Gaza and pursue further discussions to agree on borders and security frameworks.
While many details remain undisclosed, the 20-point roadmap outlines critical components:
- A six-month plan to establish demilitarization zones within Gaza.
- Framework for internationally monitored elections to govern local affairs in Gaza.
- Economic collaboration between Israeli firms and Palestinian business owners in energy and construction sectors.
U.S. officials involved in the negotiations have reported that Trump personally engaged in phone diplomacy with both Israeli and Hamas leaders in the critical final days preceding the agreement.
Reaction on the Ground
The effects of this deal have been swiftly felt. Families of hostages in Israel expressed gratitude towards Trump’s team, and rallies of relief replaced the mass protests in Tel Aviv. In Gaza, the end of a nearly two-year siege brought civilians back onto the streets. Markets in Gaza City reopened months after the conflict began. Medical supplies reached public health clinics, with NGOs reporting plans to reopen more than 40 schools by July 2024.
Political Fallout and Public Perception
Even critics of Trump appear to be reassessing their views. During Maher’s broadcast, investor Mark Cuban and CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin acknowledged Trump’s accomplishments. Sorkin remarked, “You can give this president a standing ovation for getting to this point and not give him the Nobel Peace Prize.” Such candor from varied perspectives indicates a shift in public consciousness regarding Trump’s diplomatic impact.
Polling data from early June reveals that Trump’s approval ratings in Israel have surged to 78%. Concurrently, surveys from Jordan and the UAE indicate a significant upswing in positive Arab perceptions of Trump—from 22% to 53% in light of the peace agreement.
A senior Egyptian diplomat highlighted the nature of the negotiations, stating, “This was not imposed from the outside. This came from clarity, from strength, and from practicality. That’s what Trump brought.” He noted Trump’s efficiency in demanding results while circumventing convoluted processes.
This deal stands in contrast to previous Middle Eastern diplomacy led by Trump, such as the Abraham Accords, which primarily focused on state-to-state relations. The current agreement shifts the emphasis towards addressing the complex, on-the-ground conflicts involving non-state actors, which poses greater risks but also potential for transformative change.
Looking Ahead
Much work lies ahead. The 20-point plan’s execution will be overseen by a rotating team of U.N.-approved observers, with future negotiations expected to tackle permanent border recognition and economic initiatives. Preparations for a late June summit involving Egypt, Israel, Gulf states, and European stakeholders are underway to coordinate these next steps.
As of now, daily hostilities have ceased. Families reunite and businesses reopen. In a landscape long characterized by skepticism, there is now a glimmer of hope.
Summarizing the unprecedented moment, Maher humorously quipped, “He is beloved in Israel more than any other president ever… He also won over the Arabs. He’s the only thing besides hummus they both like.” Through it all, Trump’s influence remains a topic of conversation, even as critics acknowledge the significance of his diplomatic maneuvering in a fraught region.
"*" indicates required fields
