The November 7 elections brought some startling realities for the Republican Party. As internal divisions threaten to overshadow their appeal, the party faces urgent calls to concentrate on the economic challenges that resonate with voters—namely, the relentless rise in the cost of living. Conservative commentator Scott Jennings underscored this point in a recent panel discussion: “JD Vance is RIGHT. Republicans should focus on cost of living and affordability. We should stop infighting. Focus on issues.”
This call for unity isn’t merely about internal party dynamics. Jennings pointed out that the GOP risks alienating potential supporters by allowing political drama to take precedence over vital voter concerns. “There’s some things to be learned about how we run campaigns,” he stated, emphasizing, “but remember: these are BLUE states. Democrats won in blue states. Being overly emotional is probably not a great idea.” His words highlight a critical understanding of contemporary electoral landscapes—emotional appeals don’t always translate to electoral success.
The Democrats’ recent victories reinforce Jennings’ warnings. Key gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey swung heavily in favor of Democratic candidates who prioritized messaging around affordability, with Virginia’s Abigail Spanberger and New Jersey’s Mikie Sherrill capitalizing on the electorate’s economic fears. In Virginia alone, almost half of voters identified the economy as their primary concern. The results clearly signal which party is currently winning that narrative—a disconnect exists for Republicans who continue to overlook economic discussions crucial to daily life.
Mamdani’s performance in New York City further mirrors this trend. Running on a socialist platform, he engaged voters with the same theme—affordability—highlighting the pressing concerns about living costs that weigh heavily on taxpayers. More than half of New Yorkers in that election cited cost of living as their chief concern, illustrating that the party’s messaging must align with voter realities.
Yet, the Republicans’ approach remains mired in lofty discussions about stock market performance and retirement funds. That type of rhetoric doesn’t resonate with many working families struggling to afford basic necessities. With grocery prices climbing and housing costs stretching budgets thinner, the GOP’s focus appears less relevant to the common voter. Trump himself acknowledged this in an interview, stating, “We learned a lot… Republicans don’t talk about it. They don’t talk about the word affordability.” This admission reflects a growing awareness among party leaders that the economic conversation needs to change.
At the nexus of this discussion is James Blair, Trump’s political advisor, who drew attention to Mamdani’s success: “Why does Zohran Mamdani do so well last night? He relentlessly focused on affordability.” This insight could offer a path forward for Republicans uneasy about the current economic focus within their messaging.
Vice President JD Vance added his voice to the chorus this week, emphasizing that “We’re going to keep on working to make a decent life affordable in this country, and that’s the metric…” His insights reflect a shift in the party’s younger members, suggesting that economic populism may be crucial for winning over broader demographics outside Trump’s traditional base.
Vivek Ramaswamy reiterated this sentiment, stating plainly, “Our side needs to focus on affordability… Make the American dream affordable.” Such remarks indicate a recognition that without addressing affordability, the Republicans might endanger their connection with everyday Americans.
However, a divide still exists among party members. During a CNN panel discussion, Jennings and activist David Hogg clashed over the meaning of affordability, with Hogg arguing, “I think part of the reason [Mamdani’s] so powerful is because people are tired of being lectured by men with Rolexes on CNN about affordability in this country.” This exchange encapsulates larger voter frustrations with political elites who seem disconnected from economic realities. Voters want concrete solutions to the mounting pressures they face, not mere slogans.
The statistics paint a bleak picture. Real wages have stagnated, while housing costs have risen over 5% nationally. With rising drug prices and elevated utility bills, many families now face a two-fold challenge: high costs and low availability of options like child care. This dire predicament isn’t just a talking point; it paints a stark reality that demands attention.
In California, the passage of Proposition 50, linked to zoning reform, showcases how Democrats adeptly connected affordability with broader systemic issues. There, voters who prioritized economic concerns largely supported the measure, indicating the importance of framing proposals that tackle the cost of living in tangible ways. For the GOP, it’s not enough just to voice opposition; they need to put forth clear, actionable alternatives.
The message is clear and urgent: if Republicans do not adapt their strategies to emphasize economic pressing issues effectively, they risk not only decreased voter turnout but also the loss of their position as advocates for working-class Americans. Jennings’ closing remarks on the panel encapsulate this well: “Focus on issues.” As voters increasingly cast their ballots based on economic pressures, the stakes could not be higher. Ignoring affordability means courting political irrelevance.
"*" indicates required fields
