Florida and Texas Race to Eliminate Property Taxes: An Analysis
The competition between Florida and Texas to become the first state to eliminate property taxes could have significant implications for how Americans view local taxation. Both states are aggressively pursuing reforms aimed at reducing or wholly abolishing property taxes. Each step draws national interest and debate. Florida appears poised to push forward with multiple proposals, while Texas has already seen success in enhancing tax relief measures.
Florida’s approach, spearheaded by House Speaker Daniel Perez, is ambitious. On October 16, 2025, he introduced seven constitutional amendments targeting the property tax system. These proposals aim to eliminate non-school property taxes on homesteads, expand tax exemptions, and modify tax assessment limitations. In his memorandum to lawmakers, Perez emphasized the need for a diverse array of options. “It is our position that the House does not need to limit itself in presenting one single plan,” he stated. This open approach is intended to give Floridians the opportunity to shape their tax future directly through the ballot.
The varied proposals share common goals: to lighten the tax burden on homeowners while ensuring essential services like law enforcement remain funded. Notably, House Joint Resolution 207 calls for a 25% exemption on property value, potentially offering substantial relief to homeowners. Implementation of these reforms could take years, with timelines stretching from 2027 to 2037, signaling a long race ahead for change.
However, Florida’s path is not without hurdles. Unexpectedly, Governor Ron DeSantis has voiced strong opposition to the multi-option ballot strategy, labeling it as a political maneuver rather than a serious attempt to deliver meaningful relief. His criticism underscores a growing rift within the state’s leadership regarding how best to approach property tax reform. DeSantis advocates for a singular, more effective measure to streamline voter choice and ease the process of tax relief.
In a separate initiative, DeSantis has proposed a one-time property tax rebate centered on school-related taxes. This rebate, averaging $1,000 per homesteaded property, aims to benefit over 5.1 million homes. “Property taxes effectively require homeowners to pay rent to the government,” he remarked, urging lawmakers to act promptly. This proposal reflects a hands-on approach from the governor, aiming to provide immediate relief even as broader changes are debated.
On the other hand, Texas has already enacted substantial reforms. Following overwhelming approval of constitutional amendments on November 4, 2024, Texas voters secured significant tax relief, increasing the standard homestead exemption and providing enhanced protections for seniors and disabled residents. With approximately 5.7 million homeowners benefiting, these measures have sparked hope for continued tax relief. The strong public support—82% for general exemptions—demonstrates a clear mandate from voters. This voter base emerged in response to rising property values, making the case for tax reforms even more pressing.
As noted by political science professor J. Matthew Wilson, the economic backdrop in Texas supports these tax cuts, driven by robust sales and mineral tax revenues. The state’s considerable economic growth has positioned it well to manage the reduced tax income while still meeting essential state needs. “These tax breaks follow in a long line of tax reductions,” Wilson explains, reflecting Texans’ ongoing commitment to lower taxation.
Texas has also shown a commitment to eliminating other forms of taxation, such as estate and inheritance taxes, further broadening the scope of tax relief for its residents. Even as there are no immediate plans to push for full property tax abolition, the groundwork has clearly been laid for a future in which voters demand further reductions.
The comparison between Florida and Texas raises questions about how tax policy can and should adapt to the needs of homeowners. Florida Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia has criticized local governments for their financial practices, highlighting instances of budget overruns. By calling attention to what he deems “wasteful and excessive spending,” Ingoglia illustrates a growing frustration among state leaders with local government practices that could impede tax relief efforts. His statements reflect a broader sentiment that reform may also necessitate changes in local governance.
Despite the different strategies in each state, the underlying issues remain similar. Both Florida and Texas recognize the need for reform in light of rising property taxes and growing public discontent. Each state’s progress will depend on their respective political dynamics, especially as they navigate inner-party disagreements and align on the paths forward.
The outcome of this race remains to be seen. Florida’s ambitious proposals versus Texas’s concrete reforms present two divergent approaches to taxation, each with its merits and challenges. As this contest unfolds, it may not only reshape local taxation policies but also redefine the broader conversation around taxation in America.
Ultimately, whether Florida or Texas becomes the first to eliminate property taxes will be a landmark event. This competition is igniting critical discussions across the nation about fairness and structure in taxation, potentially influencing other states to reevaluate their own systems. As the race heats up, Americans nationwide will be watching closely.
"*" indicates required fields
