The documentary “RFK: Legacy,” produced by Oliver Stone and directed by Sean Stone, presents a challenging perspective on the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. The film suggests the possibility of a second shooter, sparking renewed debate over a case often treated as settled with Sirhan Sirhan as the lone gunman. This exploration into RFK’s death unfolds against the backdrop of both his political career and the endeavors of his son, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The documentary highlights the tension surrounding that fateful night at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. Before Kennedy was shot shortly after his victory in the California Democratic primary, Stone probes his son about a significant shift in belief regarding the identity of the true assassin. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. transitioned from claiming Sirhan was solely to blame to suspecting Thane Eugene Cesar, an off-duty security guard who was present at the scene.
The film claims that Cesar was in a prime position to deliver fatal shots as chaos erupted when Sirhan opened fire. Kennedy Jr. argues that the autopsy results align with this theory, stating, “According to the autopsy, all four shots that struck my father were fired from behind at a steep upward angle.” This raises questions about the eyewitness accounts that pointed at Sirhan as the only shooter.
Sean Stone draws parallels between the Kennedy assassination and the circumstances surrounding the JFK assassination, noting the inconsistencies in the timeline and the actions of the accused shooters. He remarked, “The JFK assassination thing is so evidently not just a single shooter,” referring to the infamous Zapruder film that casts doubt on the official narrative regarding Lee Harvey Oswald.
Crucially, “RFK: Legacy” discusses the unsettling notion of mind control, specifically referencing the CIA’s MKUltra program. Sean Stone suggests a sinister possibility: could Sirhan have been manipulated into committing the act? He stated, “With Sirhan, it’s clear that he doesn’t have memory of it,” emphasizing the lack of recollection from the accused right after the shooting.
The allegations against Cesar extend beyond mere speculation. As Kennedy Jr. recounts findings from an autopsy report shared with him by friend Paul Schrade, it becomes evident that the forensic evidence raises alarm bells about the official narrative. Schrade, who was also shot that night, corroborated the claim of another shooter being present. He observed Cesar’s actions just before the shots were fired and is cited discussing the possibility of Cesar being the additional shooter.
Furthermore, the documentary points to previous accounts, including a 1974 article from The New York Times that detailed witness testimony of a security guard pulling a weapon. The film posits that the law enforcement response was inadequate, with police failing to examine crucial ballistics evidence based on decisive forensic details. Kennedy Jr. maintains, “The Los Angeles Police Department never examined the gun,” suggesting that critical investigations were cut short.
As the film unfolds, it navigates through a landscape of skepticism, portraying a concerted effort to dismiss or undermine the idea of conspiracies within media narratives. Sean Stone questions this reluctance to entertain the notion of collusion, saying, “The mainstream media does not want us to think that there are conspiracies in this world.” This commentary underscores a potential bias that clouds public discourse around historical events.
In a world where forgotten facts continue to challenge established narratives, “RFK: Legacy” encourages viewers to reconsider what they know about the past. The film’s claim—that Sirhan was merely a distraction for the real assassin—is one that could redefine our understanding of a pivotal moment in American history. It is now available for streaming through Angel Studios and on Amazon Prime, inviting further examination of a tragedy that still resonates in the national consciousness today.
"*" indicates required fields
