In a recent exchange that illuminated the dark underbelly of identity politics, Tish Hyman, a black lesbian singer-songwriter, grappled with the very ideology she had previously embraced. During a Q&A session with California State Senator Scott Weiner, Hyman attempted to leverage her identity in a discussion about women’s safety after a troubling incident at a Gold’s Gym. It was a stark revelation about the dynamics of the left: even those who fit neatly into the progressive agenda can find themselves pushed aside when their views diverge from the party line.
Hyman confronted the issue of a transgender individual’s access to women’s spaces, an increasingly volatile topic within progressive circles. Her question was straightforward—what protections would be offered to women in situations involving men claiming to be women? Senator Weiner’s response reflected the typical evasive rhetoric from Democratic leaders. He began with the standard platitude about safety, seamlessly transitioning into the assertion that “trans women are women.” This moment marked the first indication of Hyman’s impending disillusionment.
Hyman’s frustration only grew as she leaned into the uncomfortable truths that contradicted Weiner’s assertions. She pushed back against the prevailing narrative of gender identity with a passionate declaration: “No, they are not. They are men.” This bold stance earned her boos from the audience, highlighting a certain intolerance for dissent among progressive proponents. Hyman’s insistence on prioritizing the protection of women over the inclusion of trans women revealed a fracture in the progressive coalition—one that likely shocked many present.
As Hyman confronted the crowd’s hostility, she emphasized her identity markers, repeatedly identifying as black, lesbian, and a woman. Yet this appeal to shared identity seemed to fall flat against the overwhelming commitment to the progressive orthodoxy in the room. Weiner’s reply, lacking genuine engagement, underscored a critical point: there’s little room for deviation among loyal party members once the revolutionary momentum is established. “We have to protect the safety of all women,” he parroted, failing to address Hyman’s core concern.
This confrontation escalated, revealing Hyman’s realization of her own marginalization within a movement that had initially embraced her. Leaving the event in discontent, she remarked on her encounter with another black woman, urging her not to let identity politics exploit their shared background to advance “weird laws” that undermine traditional definitions of gender and safety.
The viral spread of Hyman’s video—viewed over 1.7 million times—highlights a growing unease among individuals who see the contradictions in the progressive agenda. While conservatives may feel inclined to champion Hyman for her courageous stance, it is crucial to consider the isolation she faced post-confrontation. She departed alone, a poignant reminder of how quickly the left can turn on its own when principles clash with ideology.
This incident serves as a cautionary tale about the nature of contemporary Marxism, particularly how it devours not only its critics but also its former allies. Hyman, embodying the archetypal intersectional victim, discovered that those perceived as ‘useful’ can become disposable if they step out of line. Her experience sheds light on a crucial truth: the radical left thrives on conformity. Once a member, if the individual’s voice strays from the party’s rigid confines, they risk becoming an outcast.
In this climate, Hyman’s struggle becomes emblematic of a broader battle within the left, revealing the underpinnings of a movement that prioritizes ideology over individuals. As identity politics and gender ideology gain greater mainstream traction, the reactions to dissenting voices will shape future discourse. Hyman’s episode might not be the last of its kind; as more people recognize the chilling effects of authoritarian wokeness, the fight over the narrative surrounding gender and safety is far from over.
"*" indicates required fields
