Chery Automobile’s attempt to showcase its Fengyun X3L SUV through a marketing stunt turned into a public relations issue when the vehicle crashed during a climb up Tianmen Mountain’s “Stairway to Heaven.” This incident highlighted not only the perils of risky promotional tactics but also raised questions about the intersection of marketing and cultural sensitivity.
On Wednesday, during a performance test, the SUV lost control and careened backward down the iconic staircase, damaging a protective guardrail. The demonstration was intended to showcase the vehicle’s off-road capabilities, using a safety rope system that unfortunately failed when its fixing point detached. The car’s power was compromised, leaving the driver unable to steer the vehicle safely, which led to a chaotic descent.
Footage of the accident spread quickly on social media, fanning the flames of public criticism. Journalist Collin Rugg’s tweet about the crash amplified the event’s reach, framing it as an embarrassing failure in a misguided effort to replicate a stunt by a major competitor. This incident not only drew attention to Chery but also sparked a broader discussion about the responsibilities companies have when conducting promotions at culturally significant sites.
The Stairway to Heaven is not just a tourist attraction; it holds spiritual significance for many. The site, recognized as a 5A-rated national tourist zone, symbolizes both natural beauty and cultural heritage. Chery’s stunt, therefore, was seen by many as an exploitation of this revered location, reducing a place of worship and mystique to a mere backdrop for marketing. The company acknowledged the lapse in its planning, stating, “The outcome has exposed our insufficient assessment of potential risks.” This admission was a critical step, but the emotional impact of the crash lingered in public discourse.
Chery’s promise to cover repair costs and cooperate with local authorities was an appropriate move designed to mitigate backlash. Their statement that “this accident did not cause any personal injuries” tried to offset concerns, yet the image of a vehicle crashing down ancient steps runs contrary to the cultural values associated with the site. Many online commentators expressed outrage, questioning the rationale behind allowing such a stunt in a location frequented by thousands.
Public sentiment turned sharply against the company as comparisons emerged with other infamous marketing blunders that utilized heritage sites. Some commentators referenced previous controversial events, noting that the pressure for virality too often trumps the preservation of a nation’s cultural landmarks. Critics pointed out that careful planning and respect for historical significance should take precedence over chasing online fame.
The marketing strategy was reportedly inspired by a viral video from a British automaker, where a vehicle climbed the same staircase without incident. However, Chery’s execution faltered dramatically, demonstrating that imitating successful stunts without thorough preparation can spell disaster. This failed demonstration not only harmed Chery’s reputation but also highlighted existing gaps in safety regulations governing promotional events at protected sites.
As government officials mull potential penalties, there is speculation that stricter regulations regarding commercial activities at heritage locations could follow. The incident has spotlighted the oversight of such practices, especially in places like Tianmen Mountain, which is part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site. This raises critical questions regarding the safeguards necessary for approving marketing activities that may pose risks to both cultural sites and public safety.
Furthermore, issues surrounding insurance and liability emerged. Chery’s acceptance of financial responsibility is a good start, yet it remains unclear whether third-party liability covered the incident or whether local tourism authorities might bear losses from reduced visitor confidence. The overall impact on tourism, a crucial part of the local economy, could also be significant as safety concerns loom in potential visitors’ minds.
Chery’s initial response through its statement and commitment to repair the damage was necessary, but long-term repercussions await the company. As consumers in China place a strong value on national heritage and expect responsibility from major brands, damage to public perception can be lasting. Whether this incident affects consumer loyalty remains to be seen.
The aftermath of the accident serves as a reminder of the risks associated with commercial ventures at cherished cultural sites. The damaged guardrail now symbolizes a miscalculation in the pursuit of brand recognition, offering a lesson for all companies eyeing high-profile locations for marketing stunts. Chery’s acknowledgment of the need to strengthen safety protocols indicates a path forward, yet the industry must tread carefully to ensure that respect for cultural heritage prevails over promotional ambition.
"*" indicates required fields
