Recent developments suggest that military operations against Venezuela are being seriously considered by the Trump Administration. According to CBS, the president was briefed on potential military targets, including possible strikes on land. This briefing included some of the top military officials such as Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine, emphasizing the high-level nature of the discussions about Venezuela.
The backdrop to this meeting is significant. Just one day prior, the USS Gerald Ford carrier strike group arrived off the South American coast, signaling a military presence that could play a crucial role in any operational plans. Furthermore, the United States has recently focused on drug trafficking in the region, successfully destroying 21 boats involved in smuggling. “My advice to foreign terrorist organizations is do not get in a boat,” Hegseth stated, underscoring the administration’s firm stance against those compromising American safety through drug trafficking.
Plans reportedly discussed during the briefing include airstrikes targeting seaports, airports, and military facilities in Venezuela. Military officials appear prepared for a range of scenarios, including the possibility of targeting Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro directly. Trump’s designation of the Cartel de los Soles as a narco-terrorist group points to a clear U.S. strategy: to dismantle drug trafficking operations that threaten national security.
Insights from military experts further illuminate the proposed strategies. Jim Stavridis, a retired U.S. admiral who previously oversaw operations in the region, indicated that ground invasions might not be the objective. Instead, precision airstrikes against narcotics targets and military capabilities are expected to be prioritized. “Look for precision kinetic strikes against narcotics targets and military capability and, if that doesn’t have the desired effect, against leadership,” he advised. This suggests a methodical approach focused on crippling the regime’s infrastructure without the extensive commitment that a ground invasion would entail.
The potential targets seem carefully considered. Airstrips used by drug traffickers along with logistical hubs for smuggling operations could be among the first hit. An unnamed former Drug Enforcement Administration agent emphasized that crippling Venezuela’s drug transport capabilities would be integral to the mission. Strikes on storage facilities following the destruction of air defenses are also likely to be a key part of any military action. Thus, preparations for a military response are well underway.
Venezuela’s military is already reacting. Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López has declared a state of alert, mobilizing almost 200,000 troops and putting the country’s military arsenal on full operational readiness. His assertions highlight an attempt to deter foreign aggression, but military analysts assert that the logistics and mobilization of forces indicate limited capacity for a ground offensive at this time. Mark Cancian, a senior defense advisor, remarked that while current forces may not suffice for a ground attack, they possess enough firepower for substantial air strikes. This distinction is critical, as it points to a tactical shift away from large-scale invasions towards more precise strike operations against specific targets.
Ultimately, the complexity of the situation in Venezuela requires careful navigation. The potential for military strikes raises questions about the balance between addressing narcotics trafficking and engaging directly with the Venezuelan regime—two objectives that are deeply intertwined. The United States seems to be positioning itself for a decisive response that seeks to undermine both the cartels and the government supporting them.
This developing scenario underscores the tense relationship between the U.S. and Venezuela, where drug trafficking and political instability occur in tandem. As military options are put on the table, one can anticipate heightened scrutiny not only from national defense experts but also from the international community regarding the consequences of such actions in a volatile region.
"*" indicates required fields
