Swalwell Faces Legal Storm as DOJ Probes Intensify
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) is bracing for significant legal challenges as the Department of Justice (DOJ) prepares to unveil further allegations related to an ongoing probe into mortgage and tax fraud. This scrutiny follows a referral from Bill Pulte, the Trump-appointed head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), who claims Swalwell misrepresented his primary residence in mortgage documents tied to his $1.2 million home in Washington, D.C.
Swalwell’s reaction reveals his concern. He states that the anticipated allegations are “false,” depicting them as retaliation for his vocal opposition to Donald Trump. “As the most vocal critic of Donald Trump over the last decade … the only thing I am surprised about is that it took him this long to come after me,” he expressed, hinting at his belief that the legal focus on him is politically charged.
The allegations stem from Swalwell’s purchase of a renovated Victorian bungalow in a historic Washington neighborhood. He reportedly claimed the property as his primary residence during its 2020 acquisition, a designation that would allow him to secure more favorable loan terms. Such misrepresentation can lead to significant legal consequences if proven true.
Pulte’s recent referrals represent a broader trend targeting Democratic officials for potential misconduct. Swalwell is the fourth Democrat this year to face such scrutiny, joining Letitia James, Adam Schiff, and Lisa Cook. Pulte insists that the investigations focus on fraud, not on political affiliations. He firmly stated, “Is it mortgage fraud to say that you live in one area and not another area? Yes, it is mortgage fraud.”
Many Democrats, including Swalwell, dispute the claims and assert that they are politically motivated. Swalwell further indicated his commitment to continue his legal fight against Trump, stating, “Of course, I will not end my lawsuit against [Trump].”
While the DOJ continues its investigation, internal sources suggest that the latest round of allegations may expand to include tax discrepancies and conflicting declarations about homeowner insurance related to the same property. This federal inquiry complements a pattern of increasing scrutiny over the financial dealings of Democratic officials, a situation that has sparked significant debate.
While official charges have yet to be filed, the ongoing investigation casts doubt over Swalwell’s adherence to financial and residency rules. The initial FHFA inquiry revealed evidence suggesting that he falsely claimed primary residence status for the D.C. property without actually living there. Such misstatements could pose serious legal risks under federal law.
Federal law treats mortgage fraud as knowingly providing false information to influence a lender’s decision, with penalties potentially reaching up to 30 years in prison and fines exceeding $1 million. Although no indictment has been handed down yet, any potential charges would need to come from a federal grand jury that is currently reviewing the evidence.
Swalwell dismisses the claims as part of a politically charged strategy to silence him. He has consistently linked his legal troubles to his lawsuit against Trump, emphasizing his refusal to capitulate to what he views as intimidation. In defiance, he stated, “I refuse to live in fear in what was once the freest country in the world.”
This case is not isolated. It reflects broader challenges facing numerous Democratic leaders, with Letitia James recently indicted for similar mortgage-related issues. As legal examinations continue for Schiff and Cook, they all maintain innocence, labeling the process as a misuse of power aimed at suppressing dissent.
Adding to the scrutiny, former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy has raised questions about Swalwell’s judgment and past associations, specifically referencing his links to a suspected Chinese spy. McCarthy questioned, “Eric Swalwell cannot get a security clearance in the public sector. Why would we ever give him a security clearance in the secrets to America?”
Pulte’s continued focus on mortgage fraud emphasizes a strategic alignment in these investigations. His agency claims to operate on an objective review basis of mortgage applications and financial records. “We are seeing a pattern, and we have a duty to act,” a source familiar with the referral process noted.
Critics argue that Pulte’s actions selectively target Democratic officials, alleging political bias. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has accused Pulte of diverting taxpayer resources toward baseless investigations against Trump’s perceived adversaries, branding him as “a malignant hack.”
The decision on whether the DOJ will formalize charges relies on the strength of the new evidence being evaluated. High standards govern indictments involving sitting members of Congress, contributing to the complex political landscape surrounding Swalwell since his ouster from the Intelligence Committee. This tumultuous backdrop has only intensified scrutiny over his past actions and financial practices.
As the DOJ’s anticipated update nears, the unfolding events promise to deepen the ongoing legal and political strife engulfing Swalwell. For the time being, Swalwell is prepared for an intense battle—both legally and in the court of public opinion.
"*" indicates required fields
