Tensions are flaring in Mexico City as thousands gather to voice their discontent with the ruling party, MORENA, and President Claudia Sheinbaum. Accusations of collusion with drug cartels and political persecution are at the forefront of these protests. This unrest reflects broader public frustration over rampant corruption, escalating violence, and a perceived erosion of democracy.
Mexican Senator Lilly Téllez is among the most vocal critics, claiming that Sheinbaum has wielded state power to silence dissenters. In a statement that reverberated across social media, she underscored her fears of political persecution: “The president has threatened me to proceed against me with criminal prosecution to get me out of the Senate, and get me in jail.” Such claims have captured public attention, amplifying the outcry on the streets.
The protests have emerged during a time of intensifying scrutiny of government and cartel connections. Alarming discoveries, such as clandestine crematoria in Jalisco, showcase the potential complicity of state actors in criminal activities. This situation raises troubling questions about the government’s commitment to confronting cartel violence, especially as it follows inspections that ruled out any criminal conduct just months earlier.
Demonstrators on October 10 surged through Mexico City, raising banners and chanting against what they termed a “narco-state.” Their messages accused Sheinbaum of being a mere “puppet of criminal elites,” emphasizing the belief that cartels unduly influence elections and local governance. While the government refutes accusations of cartel financing, the mood in the streets tells another story.
Téllez’s allegations are not isolated; they connect to broader themes of corruption within the political sphere. Over the months, she has warned of a troubling infiltration by drug trafficking organizations at high levels of government. Investigators have pointed to financial connections between major backers of MORENA and individuals under scrutiny for drug-related crimes. However, the lack of solid evidence hampers the push for accountability, mired in opaque campaign financing practices.
The gravity of Téllez’s claims heightened when she revealed that threats had been made against her, showcasing the pervasive atmosphere of intimidation in contemporary Mexican politics. With the Sheinbaum administration already criticized for its handling of violence and disappearances, her government faces mounting pressure.
The numbers tell a stark story: the IBERO Human Rights Programme reports a record 31,083 disappearances in 2024. As civilians become targets in the search for missing persons, the line between state neglect and outright complicity in cartel violence blurs, intensifying public distrust in official institutions.
The protests are fueled not only by a reaction to violence but also by anger over what many perceive as an undermining of democratic safeguards. Critics argue that Sheinbaum, who ascended to the presidency in October 2024, has carried on and expanded a political apparatus too willing to accept corruption and too cozy with cartel interests. Allegations of judiciary manipulation and targeting of the opposition through legal actions add to public anger.
International dynamics are also influencing the situation. Reports indicate that U.S. intelligence has observed growing anxiety among cartel leadership, particularly in light of former President Trump’s potential return to power. Trump has floated the idea of labeling cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and suggested military options to combat them. This raises concerns for those in the U.S. who believe Mexican leadership has not done enough to cut links with cartel activity and has allowed the flow of fentanyl into America.
In Téllez’s viral tweet, a suggestion emerges that the “narco-leaders are TERRIFIED” of political shifts that might disrupt their operations, indicating a possible tipping point for Mexican citizens who are fed up with the status quo. This rising tide of public anger could lead to significant political upheaval if unaddressed.
Protesters in Mexico City made their voices heard by marching near the National Palace, waving flags and demanding justice. Many calls underscored that the country belongs to its people and not to cartels. The outcry resonated with citizens who believe government officials have been complicit in covering up the truth about cartel activities.
In response to the growing unrest, the federal government has pledged reforms, including investment in forensic technologies. Yet, such promises are met with skepticism. The earlier findings of human remains and personal items on the ranch in Teuchitlán—an area that had been previously cleared by authorities—underscore the public’s deep-seated distrust of official narratives.
As suspicions of corruption deepen, scrutiny of MORENA’s financial backers continues to rise. Though definitive evidence remains scarce, reports from watchdog organizations indicate troubling campaign contributions and potential interference in investigations. Questions linger about the effectiveness of the judicial system in maintaining independence under Sheinbaum’s administration.
Further complicating the situation is the reality faced by activists and journalists. Mexico stands as one of the most perilous environments globally for reporters, particularly those delving into cartel activities and government scandal. According to Reporters Without Borders, Mexico ranks just behind countries embroiled in active conflict for journalist safety. The deaths and disappearances of those shining a light on these issues loom as grim reminders of the stakes involved.
As the political landscape grows more volatile, President Sheinbaum confronts rising unrest on multiple fronts—politics, civil society, and international relations. The explosive public response to Téllez’s claims signals a critical juncture for the current government. With inquiries and accusations swirling, the next few weeks promise to be pivotal, as new evidence and pressures could change the trajectory of Mexico’s political future.
"*" indicates required fields
