In a strategic analysis of China’s potential approach to Taiwan, experts highlight a chilling possibility: the island may face a silent siege aimed at undermining its government without resorting to violence. According to a new report from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), China might leverage bureaucratic tactics and cyber attacks to gradually suffocate Taiwan’s access to vital resources like fuel and electricity. This plan would rely not on the roar of missiles but on the whispers of paperwork and patrol boats.
The report emphasizes that the objective isn’t an immediate invasion. Instead, China seeks to instill a sense of futility in Taiwan’s resistance, as noted by report author Craig Singleton. He describes this approach as “gray-zone” tactics—a campaign of slow-motion strangulation that could eventually give way to more aggressive actions, creating a volatile situation that could escalate quickly.
During a recent tabletop exercise named “Energy Siege,” analysts simulated a prolonged campaign where Chinese forces would methodically disrupt Taiwan’s imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and other energy sources. This exercise revealed that even small disruptions could lead to significant consequences for Taiwan, which is precariously reliant on imports for its energy supply. Singleton warns that losing access to LNG could decimate Taiwan’s electrical grid within weeks, precipitating a global crisis in semiconductor production since Taiwan manufactures a substantial share of the world’s chips.
Taiwan’s energy reliance complicates matters further. The island imports nearly all of its energy, largely dependent on natural gas and coal, holding just a few weeks’ worth of reserves. Its energy infrastructure is vulnerable due to geographical proximity to mainland China, which makes it an easy target for potential blockades or cyber intrusions. The report warns that if Beijing succeeded in implementing an “energy quarantine,” it could dramatically reduce Taiwan’s power generation and force difficult choices about resource allocation between military needs and essential services.
The FDD analysis suggests that information warfare will play a crucial role in this strategy. Chinese cyber operations aim to infiltrate Taiwan’s energy systems, embedding malware and creating chaos within the power supply chain. Furthermore, the psychological aspect of urban warfare is not to be underestimated; Beijing plans to weaken public confidence in the Taiwanese government through a barrage of disinformation, airing rumors and influencing perceptions against leadership.
Critically, the report calls attention to the potential ripple effects across global markets and the integrated nature of supply chains. A prolonged energy crisis in Taiwan could precipitate a much larger disruption in the semiconductor industry, affecting everything from consumer electronics to defense manufacturing in the United States and beyond.
Moving forward, the report underscores the need for the United States to consider enhancing its LNG export capabilities to support Taiwan directly, pinning energy security as a fundamental part of the island’s resilience strategy. Singleton asserts that “coercion, not combat,” is the favored tactic of Beijing. If Taiwan’s determination falters under sustained pressure, the consequences could reverberate far beyond the region, reshaping international relations and supply chains.
As confrontations over Taiwan heat up, experts warn of the increasingly thin line between peace and coercive pressure. The current tension may be a precursor to more serious conflicts, with the possibility that the first act of aggression may stem from Beijing’s efforts to clandestinely disrupt and destabilize Taiwan’s energy infrastructure without firing a single shot. The stakes have never been higher, as both Taiwan and its allies prepare to navigate an uncertain future.
"*" indicates required fields
