Fox News host Will Cain has reignited a critical discussion around the H-1B visa program, questioning whether U.S. companies are misusing it to displace American workers with cheaper foreign labor. His comments aired on November 12, 2025, and quickly drew attention online, with reactions surfacing shortly after. Eric Daugherty’s tweet—”Hmm. Wonder what this is a response to? Hmmm…”—highlights the underlying discontent regarding this heated debate.
Cain’s argument rests on compelling statistics. He pointed out that “Seventy percent of H-1B visa holders come from India, and another 10–15 percent from China.” He further stressed that “Eighty percent of H-1B approvals are for entry and junior-level jobs.” Such figures are troubling, especially when paired with assertions about a talent shortage in the U.S. If the program is disproportionately filled with lower-tier positions, doubts arise about its intent and efficiency.
The H-1B visa was created to address skill gaps in specialized fields such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, critics argue it has devolved into a mechanism for companies to cut labor costs while sidelining domestic talent. According to Cain and his supporters, businesses are predicating their hiring strategies on the availability of cheaper junior-level foreign workers rather than seeking high-skilled talent.
Palmer Luckey, a notable entrepreneur, echoed Cain’s sentiments, labeling the program “a scheme to try and replace American workers with slave labor that can’t ever escape.” Luckey’s critique reflects longstanding frustrations in the tech industry over the abuse of H-1B labor, emphasizing wage suppression and neglect of domestic hiring.
The conversation intensified following Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene’s statements, where she condemned various sectors for exploiting the H-1B system. Her proclamation that “Big Tech, AI giants, hospitals, and industries across the board have abused the H-1B system to cut out our own people” sums up a growing conservative sentiment that prioritizes American workers. Greene has also expressed her intention to propose legislation aimed at phasing out the visa program.
The timing of these debates is critical. Just days before Greene’s remarks, former President Trump defended the H-1B system in a conversation with Laura Ingraham, suggesting that “You do need to bring in talent.” However, Ingraham countered, “If you want to raise wages for American workers, you can’t flood the country with tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of foreign workers.” This intra-party disagreement shows a rift among conservatives over how best to balance immigration policies with the interests of American labor.
Notably, Trump’s Labor Department is actively investigating nearly 200 companies accused of misusing the H-1B program, indicating recognition of the problem at a governmental level. These investigations focus on ensuring compliance with fair wage practices and protecting U.S. workers from displacement, reinforcing fears about the system’s integrity.
Recent data underscores Cain’s criticisms further. Federal records reveal that over 80 percent of H-1B visa approvals in 2023 and 2024 were for lower-level positions, despite ongoing discussions about the need for specialized expertise. The concentration of H-1B holders—over 85 percent—in the information technology sector poses a more pressing concern, particularly when many U.S. workers have faced layoffs from these same companies during cost-cutting measures.
A notorious case from 2015 involving Disney, which laid off over 200 American IT workers to train their H-1B replacements, exemplifies the program’s flaws and has kept worries about domestic job security alive. Such incidents highlight ongoing tensions surrounding the viability of American workers when faced with cheaper alternatives.
Supporters of the H-1B program argue that maintaining access to foreign labor is essential for sustaining America’s competitive edge. An anonymous tech executive commented, “We’ve got to stay competitive globally. We can’t build the future without foreign engineers.” Yet, opponents contend that relying on foreign labor hinders necessary investments in American education and training programs.
Cain’s statements have rekindled a call for substantial reforms—or even the outright elimination—of the program. Daugherty’s tweet resonates with many who recognize Cain’s comments as a direct response to their frustrations about a system that seems continuously rigged against American workers.
Policy experts are observing these developments closely, knowing that any shifts to the H-1B program will have wide-reaching impacts across various industries. Major companies, including tech giants like Google and Amazon, are significant sponsors of H-1B visas, and changes could necessitate a reevaluation of their hiring practices and labor budgets—entirely redefining their approach to workforce management.
The political landscape regarding the H-1B program remains contentious. While some lawmakers push for stricter regulations, others from both parties show hesitance, citing industry opposition and the complexities involved in overhauling a decades-old initiative. Previous proposals by the Biden administration that aimed to prioritize higher-paying jobs and curb outsourcing were stalled, highlighting the challenges facing comprehensive immigration reform.
Currently, the fate of the H-1B program hangs in uncertainty. Cain’s critique resonates deeply with many who feel sidelined by existing labor policies. “Nobody says Americans aren’t good enough to do these jobs,” Cain asserted. “They say it because it’s cheaper to hire somebody else. Don’t say it’s about skills. Call it what it is.” His remarks encapsulate a broader frustration that demands attention, pushing the conversation around the H-1B visa program into the political spotlight once again.
"*" indicates required fields
