Wokeness has become a touchstone for heated debates about gender, sports, and societal norms. The term itself, though often thrown around, signifies a troubling mindset rooted in a distortion of reality… one that affects individuals differently. It’s clear that a deeper affliction lies beneath the surface of wokeness.
This sentiment resonates through the words of women’s sports advocate Riley Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer, who pointed out the glaring irony in Megan Rapinoe’s criticism of efforts to protect women’s sports from biological males. “Megan Rapinoe questioning the motives behind protecting women’s sports is peak irony,” Gaines stated on X, highlighting that Rapinoe’s career flourished in a protected female category. This underscores a fundamental inconsistency in the arguments presented by those who, like Rapinoe, challenge the integrity of women’s sports.
Rapinoe’s remarks aired during her podcast, where she questioned whether the movement to safeguard women’s athletics was truly about protecting women or merely a façade for fear. Her comments came on the heels of an op-ed by Elizabeth Eddy, a retired National Women’s Soccer League player, who advocated for clear gender standards in the league. Eddy’s call was met with outrage, as leaders from Angel City FC denounced her for being “racist and transphobic.” This overreaction points to a disturbing trend: emotional responses overpowering rational discourse in the name of inclusivity.
The crux of the issue appears to be a derangement of thought that clouds judgment among certain individuals. Young liberal women, in particular, face mental health challenges at higher rates than their counterparts. When facing an emotionally charged topic such as gender in sports, this mental state can translate into a form of mental rigidity. One can’t help but notice the prevalence of narcissism in the self-righteous attitudes displayed by some advocates. This trait reveals itself in Rapinoe’s obliviousness to the irony of her position—benefiting from a system that she now seeks to undermine.
Furthermore, the phenomenon of weaponized compassion cannot be overlooked. Individuals perform acts of solidarity, often ritualistically, with the expectation that they will be viewed as socially conscious and morally superior. Those failing to adhere to these standards, or who dare to question them, are quickly labeled as bigoted. This dynamic fosters a culture of intolerance, as dissenters become targets of hostility, which only serves to reinforce divisions.
The stakes rise even higher when this hostility manifests as support for oppressive measures disguised as benevolence. The inversion of truth allows for the marginalization of biological women, with phrases like “certain kinds of women” emerging in discussions about identity. Such language diminishes the experiences and rights of those who don’t conform to a shifting narrative.
In this web of complexities, clarity emerges in the voices of advocates like Gaines, who offer a counterpoint to the prevailing narrative. Their commitment to the integrity of women’s sports underscores a broader imperative: to safeguard the hard-won rights and opportunities built on a foundation of biological reality. As the discourse evolves, it is crucial to navigate these debates with a keen awareness of the underlying derangements at play, recognizing the value of genuine dialogue amid rising tensions.
"*" indicates required fields
