Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) created quite a stir in the House of Representatives when he confronted Delegate Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands) about her ties to Jeffrey Epstein. In a bold move, Norman attempted to hold Plaskett accountable by proposing a resolution to censure her for conduct deemed detrimental to the integrity of the House. This resolution, however, did not pass.
During his remarks, Norman made serious allegations against Plaskett. He claimed that she engaged in “inappropriate coordination” with Epstein during a congressional hearing in February 2019. According to Norman, Plaskett received real-time coaching from Epstein on her lines of questioning, and afterward, he congratulated her with a message stating, “good work.” This accusation raised eyebrows, given Epstein’s notorious criminal history.
Norman did not shy away from detailing Epstein’s background, emphasizing that he was a convicted sex offender who had pled guilty in 2008 to serious charges related to child prostitution. The congressman pointed out that Epstein served only 13 months in prison despite numerous allegations of sexual abuse involving minors. Norman’s insistence on the severity of Epstein’s actions lent weight to his claims about Plaskett’s choices.
Furthermore, Norman stated that Plaskett was communicating with Epstein even while he was under federal investigation, which began in November 2018. This was just months before their congressional hearing, a time when Epstein was increasingly in the spotlight due to investigative reports from the Miami Herald that scrutinized his plea deal and shed light on the accounts of his victims.
Norman referenced documents from Epstein’s estate that linked Plaskett to Epstein during the House Committee on Oversight and Reform hearing, which included testimony from Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former attorney. He underscored that Plaskett was coordinating her questioning with Epstein via text messages during the hearing itself. This revelation was particularly alarming to Norman, as it suggested a troubling lapse in judgment, especially given Plaskett’s previous service in the U.S. Department of Justice and her current position on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
In calling for censure, Norman did not hold back on the implications of Plaskett’s actions. He stated that her willingness to accept guidance from someone with Epstein’s background raised significant questions about her integrity and capability to serve in her current capacity. In a passionate plea, he urged his colleagues to recognize the seriousness of her conduct and take action by supporting the resolution.
Despite Norman’s fervent arguments, the House ultimately voted down the motion to censure Plaskett, leaving many to question not only her actions but the broader standards of accountability within the chamber. The outcome underscores the complexities of the political landscape and the challenges faced when addressing allegations linked to prominent figures like Epstein.
Rep. Norman’s direct approach and willingness to confront delicate issues head-on demonstrated a fierce commitment to transparency and integrity in government. His remarks have sparked discussions about the duties and responsibilities of elected officials, particularly those with ties to controversial figures.
"*" indicates required fields
