Candace Owens has stirred controversy with her alarming claim that Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron are behind an assassination plot targeting her. Owens shared this assertion on social media, reporting that she had been contacted by a high-ranking employee within the French government. In her post, she emphasized the credibility of the informant, stating, “I have deemed the information they gave me to be credible enough to share publicly in the event that something happens.”
Her message garnered substantial attention, amassing over 66,000 likes and millions of views almost immediately. Owens detailed that the Macrons allegedly authorized a team from the National Gendarmerie Intervention Group (GIGN) to carry out her assassination. She also mentioned the involvement of an Israeli operative within this supposed assassination squad. This claim adds a layer of international intrigue to her allegations.
Moreover, Owens linked the purported plot to the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was killed on September 10. According to Owens, Kirk’s assassin had connections to the French Foreign Legion, indicating broader “multi-state” coordination behind such violent acts. Tyler Robinson, the suspect in Kirk’s murder, faces capital murder charges and remains in custody, while Owens continues to question his guilt.
She further expressed uncertainty about who in the U.S. government can be trusted, claiming that some American leaders might be aware of the alleged scheme. In her posting, Owens stated, “I do not know who in the American government can be trusted, since this source claims our leaders are aware.” This adds to the conspiratorial tone of her claims and raises questions about accountability at both ends of the Atlantic.
Owens’ allegations do not come without precedent. She has been embroiled in a public feud with the Macron couple, fueled by her controversial assertions regarding Brigitte Macron’s gender identity. This contentious background suggests a personal motive alongside any broader political implications.
On a technical level, the GIGN, the unit Owens mentions, is renowned for counter-terrorism efforts, hostage rescues, and other high-stakes operations. This detail underscores the serious nature of her allegations, as mentioning such an elite tactical unit heightens the perceived threat.
Despite the weight of her statements, there was no immediate response from either the French government or the Macron couple regarding these claims. This silence may be interpreted as either a dismissal of the accusations or a calculated decision to avoid engaging with Owens’ narrative in a public forum.
As the situation develops, Owens’ claims remain unverified by independent sources. This uncertainty raises significant questions about the intersection of social media rhetoric, personal vendettas, and accountability within national security realms. The implications of such allegations have the potential not only for personal ramifications but also for international diplomatic relations. The public’s attention to this unfolding story reflects the growing blurriness between political commentary and alleged criminal conspiracies in today’s media landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
