Kari Lake’s recent revelations shine a harsh light on the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), a federal entity that has faced serious accusations of financial impropriety and mismanagement. During an interview, Lake outlined disturbing findings regarding the agency’s operations under the Biden administration, asserting that corruption and abusive practices are rife within the taxpayer-funded mega-organization.
One of the most alarming claims she made involved the sale of high-end broadcasting equipment at laughably low prices. “HD cameras worth $10,000 are being sold for 80 cents,” Lake stated, calling this alarming trend a “fire sale.” She pointed a finger at Radio Free Asia (RFA), one of USAGM’s largest grantees, claiming their executives falsely asserted they couldn’t operate because the government withheld funds. Lake contradicted that narrative, declaring, “We HAVE paid them. A judge forced us to pay them every month — millions of dollars. They’re lying. And now they’re selling off our equipment.” Her insistence on accountability came with a promise to unleash auditors on RFA, indicating her commitment to uncovering financial irregularities.
Lake also addressed the alarming suggestion that USAGM and Voice of America have been transformed into instruments of leftist propaganda. She revealed that some agency employees sought guidance from the Chinese embassy on improving coverage of China. “What the hell is going on?” she asked, condemning any hint of pro-Chinese Communist Party narratives. For Lake, even a second of such coverage is “too much.”
In an unusual gesture for someone in her position, Lake underscored her advocacy for budget cuts, arguing that bloated funding fuels corruption. “If Congress appropriates a billion dollars, we are FORCED BY LAW to spend it. I told them: don’t give us that much money. We don’t need it,” she declared. This call for restraint reflects her belief that financial mismanagement and the potential for criminal behavior demand scrutiny rather than additional funding.
Lake did not shy away from addressing the mainstream media during her interview, asserting that they have been complicit in misleading the public about important events, including the 2020 election. “They have been knowingly lying to the American people. They divide our country,” she said, explicitly targeting their failure to cover alleged irregularities. Her directness on this matter is striking; she lays the blame squarely on the media, accusing them of complicity in the misinformation narrative.
Regarding election integrity, Lake has shifted her stance over time. She expressed support for ending the filibuster to enact election reforms, positing that current circumstances necessitate it. “We need decisive action to protect our elections,” she explained, cautioning that Democrats are likely to dismantle the filibuster when it serves their agenda.
Furthermore, she addressed perceived injustices stemming from the January 6 events, contrasting the treatment of those involved that day against what she viewed as a lenient attitude toward more violent protests. Lake expressed a heartfelt desire for justice, not just for those politically targeted but also for individuals like Tina Peters, whom she described as a hero suffering in prison for what she considers a non-crime.
As discussions arise around traditional media versus new media, Lake voiced her approval of President Trump’s decisions to include alternative outlets in press briefings. This change, she noted, alters the dynamic of who gets to ask the questions and ultimately shapes the narrative. “REAL journalists are asking what the American people want answered,” she asserted.
In moments of reflection, Lake expressed her deep commitment to the nation. “I’d give it all up for this country. I’d lay down my life,” she said, emphasizing the sacrifices made by many who have served in the current administration. Her honesty about fear and hope encapsulates her drive to ensure accountability in Washington.
Ultimately, Kari Lake’s assertions serve as a clarion call against corruption and inefficiency in government. Her tenacity in exposing these issues—and her willingness to confront entrenched media narratives—positions her as a formidable voice advocating for transparency and reform. As she boldly states, her mission is clear: “I won’t stop beating the drum for election reform.” In a landscape riddled with challenges, her unyielding dedication signals a commitment to protect the integrity of democracy.
"*" indicates required fields
