A recent tweet from user @EricLDaugh ignited a firestorm of discussion online. The comment, which stated, “People are really disgusting, these are human beings; Native Americans should have deported all us white folk!” captures a moment of frustration over the persistent issues surrounding the treatment of Native American communities in the United States. This emotionally charged statement reflects individual sentiment and ongoing debates about history, culture, and policy that have long been overlooked.
This tweet serves as more than a fleeting online moment. It resonates deeply with themes being explored in recent academic and public initiatives focused on Native American history and legal justice. For instance, the University of New Hampshire’s Franklin Pierce School of Law has engaged with these crucial topics through its Warren B. Rudman Center for Justice, Leadership & Public Service.
In Fall 2023, the Rudman Center hosted various public events addressing vital subjects such as constitutional governance, Federal Indian Law, and the self-determination of Native American communities. Judge Arthur Gajarsa, a notable figure at the law school, emphasized the ongoing struggle for tribal governance while discussing the federal government’s responsibilities. “The process right now is self-government,” he explained, acknowledging the challenges, “It’s never going to be equal… but we’re in the process of trying.”
The significance of these discussions cannot be understated. Native communities face substantial marginalization in America, evident in alarming statistics related to poverty, incarceration, and healthcare. The legal frameworks governing tribal autonomy and relationships with the federal government play a critical role in understanding these stark differences in quality of life.
A deeper examination of literature reveals the enduring patterns of resistance among Native peoples. Books like *The 500 Years of Indigenous Resistance Comic Book* by Gord Hill and *An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States* by Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz illuminate the continual fight against colonization and cultural erasure. These works argue that federal policies historically have not only fallen short of supporting Native communities but have often resulted in further harm.
The tragic story of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 and its aftermath, the Trail of Tears, exemplifies this point. Tens of thousands of Native Americans suffered forced relocations that claimed countless lives. Assimilation policies, including boarding schools designed to eradicate Indigenous languages and cultures, also reflect a legacy of violence and neglect. Today, tribes continue to seek justice for their lands and for adherence to unfulfilled treaties by the U.S. government.
However, the challenges confronting Native communities extend beyond historical events to modern economic and legal landscapes. Recent policy changes from the Department of the Treasury and the IRS highlight some complexities tribal governments face, particularly concerning clean energy tax credits and compliance with new reporting rules. For example, in October 2024, the IRS offered penalty relief for tribal employers grappling with standards related to tip and overtime compensation. Additionally, pre-filing registration processes have been established to facilitate tribal governments’ access to benefits under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Simultaneously, federal entities like the IRS and the Department of Homeland Security shape the complicated systems Indigenous communities must navigate. Many tribal members who depend on public assistance face legal hurdles tied to immigration laws that can jeopardize their residency status, particularly for families of mixed citizenship living in or around reservations.
Addressing the gap in public awareness, educational initiatives seek to enhance civic engagement regarding issues affecting tribal communities. The Rudman Center, in collaboration with groups such as the World Affairs Council of New Hampshire, has emphasized this mission by hosting public lectures, granting scholarships to aspiring public servants, and inviting scholars to discuss the nuances of free speech and its impact on marginalized groups.
Professor Julian Jefferson encapsulated the sentiment during one panel, stating, “The U.S. Constitution provides a floor… the lion’s share of the work… is done in the 50 states.” His remarks underline that real progress often hinges on state-level policies that influence tribal law enforcement, health care funding, and educational standards.
Despite the amplification of Native voices in academic and legal circles, many activists contend that true representation remains lacking. Recent environmental conflicts, exemplified by the Dakota Access Pipeline protests at Standing Rock and the Wet’suwet’en resistance, highlight an ongoing struggle for sovereignty and recognition. These confrontations indicate the fight for cultural survival and bring attention to the legal rights and environmental protections at stake—issues that often evade substantial national media coverage.
Federal Indian Law is complex and nuanced, shaped by landmark Supreme Court cases such as *Worcester v. Georgia*, *United States v. Kagama*, and *McGirt v. Oklahoma*. While these cases affirm tribal sovereignty, the application of these rulings frequently lags, hindered by jurisdictional disputes and political pushback.
The tweet from @EricLDaugh encapsulates a bitter irony: the United States was established on land taken from Native populations, a fact that weighs heavily on contemporary policy discussions. Although the tweet may provoke division, it reflects a growing sentiment across various perspectives—that the systemic injustices experienced by Native Americans require urgent attention and that true patriotism necessitates reconciling with this history.
Policy implications stemming from these conversations are broad. The need for increased federal funding to address tribal infrastructure, expanding tribal courts’ jurisdiction, streamlining federal grant access, and consistent implementation of treaty obligations all arise as critical reforms. These proposals transcend moral arguments; they are rooted in constitutional commitments that recognize Native nations as sovereign entities.
Reflecting on the legacy of accountability championed by Senator Warren B. Rudman, it becomes clear that contemporary accountability entails recognizing Native nations as vital players in an ongoing political relationship. Senator Jeanne Shaheen remarked, “He didn’t shrink from holding anybody accountable,” underscoring the importance of respecting and addressing the ongoing concerns of Native communities.
For those interested in exploring these issues further, Native-led literature serves as an invaluable resource. Works by authors like Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, alongside oral histories from community elders, shed light on both the struggles and resilience of Indigenous peoples. These narratives are not merely academic tools; they are compelling reminders of the profound issues still at play today.
"*" indicates required fields
