What started as a software issue has snowballed into a significant point of frustration for many online users. The tweet from @EricLDaugh, filled with angry emojis and a link to a blank website, underscores a much larger problem: the accessibility of essential online content. This moment of irritation does more than express displeasure; it draws attention to the barriers ordinary people encounter when trying to access information on prominent platforms like x.com.
The technical hitch revolves around JavaScript, a programming language that drives user interaction on websites. When disabled, crucial content becomes inaccessible, leading to messages that leave users at a standstill. For those familiar with the tech landscape, this might seem like a minor hiccup. However, for older adults and anyone reliant on outdated or locked-down systems—such as those at public libraries or government offices—the impact is profound.
The viral reaction encapsulated in @EricLDaugh’s post reveals the widening gap between the expectations tech companies hold and the reality faced by many Americans. Increasingly, governmental entities and news organizations depend on social media for updates. When a user encounters an unresponsive site, they risk missing important alerts, from emergency notifications to crucial family updates. In situations where every second counts, a blank screen could translate to dire consequences.
Statistics paint a sobering picture, showing that 64% of U.S. adults over 50 turn to social media for news. Nearly half of those favor a single platform. Thus, when that platform falters, an alarming number lose their primary source of information. Further complicating matters, nearly 19 million Americans lack stable broadband access, particularly in rural areas, where a reliance on older technology often traps users behind limitations. These barriers prevent many from fully experiencing the digital world, which is designed for nimble, up-to-date connections.
Public institutions grapple with how to bridge the increasing digital divide. Take the Ames Public Library in Iowa, which strives to enhance digital literacy and increase accessibility. Yet, closure during high-use periods—like Thanksgiving—leaves many without the support they need. As voiced by one library staff member, “We try to keep access as easy as we can, but a lot of the tech is out of our control.” When websites demand features like JavaScript that are disabled for security’s sake, it creates a Catch-22 situation. Users are left with static messages and no apparent way to proceed.
This predicament extends to public safety and education, where strict web policies are enforced to guard against cyber threats. Although these policies serve as a protective measure, they can also block access to necessary information. As defined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), over 60% of system breaches occur due to browser vulnerabilities, leading many IT departments to disable JavaScript as a precaution. While these actions promote security, they simultaneously strip away users’ ability to engage with modern, essential online tools.
The uproar stemming from @EricLDaugh’s tweet touches on more than just technical specifications; it strikes at the core of accessibility. As email, news, and social media blend together to create the modern civic landscape, the concern arises: should vital public information remain contingent on using JavaScript-enabled platforms? Moreover, is it prudent for government agencies to depend on components that may alienate segments of the population?
This issue is not simply black and white. On one hand, platforms like x.com do offer visibility and rapid communication. Yet, these benefits come at a steep price: the need for users to adapt technologically. One solution could involve posting urgent information on straightforward webpages that anyone can access without the need for innovative scripts. Another potential fix is to implement “basic view” modes on platforms, allowing users without modern capabilities to receive critical updates.
For now, the responsibility primarily falls on the user to maneuver around the system. They must enable JavaScript, update their gadgets, or switch to newer technology—all while hoping to keep up. But this expectation overlooks the fact that many individuals lack the necessary resources and skills required to adapt. Until significant changes to infrastructure take place, such as new broadband initiatives and simplified web guidelines, users will continue to contend with hurdles that leave them excluded.
The unease articulated in tweets like @EricLDaugh’s echoes a genuine concern over digital access in America today. If public bodies and online platforms do not rethink their approaches to sharing crucial information, larger portions of the population—especially older adults seeking dependable news—may find themselves on the outside looking in, staring at screens that yield little more than frustration.
"*" indicates required fields
