Analysis: U.S. Efforts to Broker Peace in Ukraine Gain Momentum
President Donald Trump’s administration is accelerating efforts to end the ongoing war in Ukraine, nearly four years since it began. Recent high-profile meetings involving key negotiators signal a determined push to reach a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia. U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and adviser Jared Kushner are set to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, while Army Secretary Dan Driscoll prepares to travel to Ukraine.
These meetings come after months of intricate negotiations. The discussions faced criticism over initial proposals that favored Russian demands, such as recognizing Moscow’s control over parts of eastern Ukraine. In response to backlash from Kyiv and European allies, the U.S. revised its draft plan from 28 points to a more concise 19-point framework. A senior Ukrainian diplomat revealed that the revisions left “very few things…from the original version.”
Trump is optimistic about progress, stating that Ukraine seems “happy” with the updated terms. His comments suggest a belief in the possibility of finally reaching a deal, with only a few remaining disagreements. Ukrainian National Security Adviser Rustem Umerov expressed hope for support from European partners and anticipates a potential visit by Ukraine’s President to the U.S. in November for final discussions.
However, not all voices are urging optimism. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov has made it clear that Russia will not concede on key issues. “There can be no question of any concessions,” he stated, reflecting Russia’s insistence on retaining its strategic gains since the war’s escalation in early 2022. This positions the Kremlin as staunchly protective of its interests amid ongoing negotiations.
Despite officials signaling potential pathways for oversight agreements, skepticism remains high. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov cautioned that it would be premature to declare imminent peace, highlighting the challenges that could arise. The situation on the ground remains dire, with continued fighting and casualties. Ukrainian forces have resumed drone attacks within Russian territory, while the Russian military has increased missile strikes on critical Ukrainian infrastructure.
Opinions in Kyiv are fraught with tension, particularly amid corruption investigations that have shaken the public’s trust in leadership. Concerns churn within opposition parties, notably about any peace plan that might legitimize territorial losses to Russia. Leaked communications have shown that Ukrainian officials are wary of a backlash against potential concessions, especially regarding territorial sovereignty.
The war’s toll since the outbreak in February 2022 has led to significant loss of life, widespread displacement, and strained international relations. The Biden administration’s efforts seek to focus on bringing an end to the conflict, allowing for a shift back to domestic matters. Army Secretary Driscoll’s high-level meetings in Abu Dhabi have been described as “frank but constructive,” indicating a willingness to engage with the Russian side while preparing for discussions with Ukraine’s leadership.
Criticism from American lawmakers is vigorous. Senator Mitch McConnell has publicly questioned the merit of a deal that rewards aggression, while other representatives have raised alarms over perceived opacity in the negotiations. Former U.S. ambassador William Taylor criticized Witkoff’s actions, alleging they undermined earlier attempts to build rapport with Ukraine’s leadership. This reflects a broader concern about the transparency of the ongoing diplomatic efforts.
The involvement of Kushner underscores Trump’s reliance on his inner circle, which previously managed foreign policy during his presidency. His experience in peace efforts elsewhere, particularly in the Middle East, brings a strategic angle to these negotiations. Yet, as former Secretary of State Marco Rubio noted, Russia’s influence remains a critical factor in the outcome of any potential deal.
While the latest plan includes joint reconstruction funds upon cessation of hostilities and a moratorium on NATO applications by Ukraine, its specifics remain undisclosed. Ukrainian lawmakers have yet to vote on any formal agreement, raising questions about the deal’s viability.
Trump has reiterated the importance of tangible outcomes before any summit with Putin can be arranged. “I look forward to hopefully meeting with President Zelenskyy and President Putin soon,” he stated, emphasizing that talks should only progress once the terms of the deal reach a substantial form. His focus appears to be on navigating this diplomatic landscape effectively, as evidenced by his statement about prioritizing domestic matters in 2026 following an acceptable resolution.
As the week unfolds, Witkoff’s journey to Moscow and Driscoll’s anticipated visit to Kyiv could serve as pivotal moments in the quest for peace. The urgency is palpable—achieving a resolution could offer a chance for Trump to recalibrate American priorities while addressing pressing domestic needs. Yet, numerous challenges remain unresolved, and the path to peace hangs precariously in balance as the clock continues to tick.
"*" indicates required fields
