The recent claim circulating online about the World Economic Forum’s supposed plans for a dramatic reduction in global population raises serious concerns about the proliferation of misinformation. This theory suggests that six billion people could die by 2025 as part of a sinister agenda. The origins of such frightening assertions can be traced back to various posts on social media, notably fueled by Instagram and Facebook, introducing disinformation rooted in fabricated quotes and dubious sources.
Central to this claim is a suspicious article from The People’s Voice, a site notorious for spreading misleading information. It boldly states, “A World Economic Forum report hiding in plain sight confirms that upwards of six billion people will die in 2025.” Thorough investigations by reputable fact-checkers like PolitiFact reveal that this assertion is entirely unfounded. There is simply no such document supporting this catastrophic forecast.
The article references forecasts from Deagel.com, a website originally dedicated to military data, which made questionable predictions regarding population reductions in Western countries. Notably, Deagel has publicly admitted the speculative nature of its findings and the reliance on unverifiable sources, illustrating a fundamental lack of credibility. Its disclaimer indicates the dubious nature of its data, remarking, “We assume that the official data…released by governments is fake, cooked or distorted…” This acknowledgment raises further doubts about the legitimacy of projections linking Deagel’s speculations to the World Economic Forum.
Compounding the situation is a quote attributed to Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, alleging that “at least 4 billion ‘useless eaters’ shall be eliminated…by means of limited wars, organized epidemics…and starvation.” However, this quotation does not exist in Schwab’s writings. It was wrongly sourced from John Coleman’s conspiracy-laden book, showing how misattributions can fabricate narratives that instill fear. In reality, Schwab discusses economic recovery in Covid-19: The Great Reset, not a plan for population control.
Misinformation often manipulates quotes from obscure sources to create false links to high-profile figures. Similar tactics were previously employed against Bill Gates, twisting genuine comments into alarming allegations. In a widely circulated quote from a 2010 TED talk, Gates discussed efforts to reduce child mortality, noting that improvements in health care could lead to slowed population growth. Taken out of context, it was misrepresented as a call for mass sterilization. This manipulation demonstrates the dangers of misrepresentation and how easily the truth can be distorted.
The origin of these conspiracy theories can be traced back to the WEF’s “Great Reset” initiative, introduced during the 2020 Davos meetings. While intended to focus on sustainable economic recovery post-pandemic, the term “reset” was manipulated by critics to suggest a darker agenda of control rather than recovery. The situational vagueness and WEF’s elite image paved the way for these unfounded theories to thrive.
Analysis shows a significant surge in conspiracy discussions surrounding the “Great Reset,” with millions of interactions on social media. Theories took on a life of their own, drawing in public figures like Schwab and Gates, leading many to perceive malicious intent behind public health measures. Melanie Smith of Graphika observes that the most engaging conspiracies often resonate with government skeptics across various political motivations.
The role of international disinformation networks adds another layer of complexity. The recent resurgence of the death forecast hoax was fueled by users from foreign sources who helped disseminate the claims further. Findings by Myth Detector indicate that misinformation can break through geographic barriers, emphasizing the need for vigilance in verifying sources.
To the discerning consumer, the misinformation at play may seem evident. Still, the rapid sharing of these claims across social media diminishes public trust in critical institutions and health initiatives. The overall mechanism of this misinformation ecosystem is revealing. False documents, manipulated quotes, and speculative data undergird these theories, often looking plausible to those untrained in critical analysis. When fears are exploited, the potency of misinformation increases.
The viral premise that the “same elitists pushing for depopulation” orchestrate these events deserves scrutiny. When examined closely, the foundation of these claims reveals a troubling lack of evidence—no documents, no credible sources, just recycled rumors repurposed for sensationalism. In instances like this, discernment and critical thinking are essential for navigating the murky waters of online information.
"*" indicates required fields
