Former President Donald Trump’s recent remarks have ignited a considerable political uproar. Over the Thanksgiving weekend, he directed his ire at Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz and the state’s Somali immigrant community. His comments included harsh criticisms of Walz’s refugee policies, accusing him of allowing extensive fraud and claiming that billions were flowing out of the country due to these regulations.
The situation escalated when Trump referred to Walz using a derogatory term, a choice that drew immediate condemnation from disability advocates and political opponents alike. On Air Force One, Trump stated, “I think there’s something wrong with him! Absolutely. You have a problem with it?!” He attributed blame to Walz for allowing Somalis to settle in Minnesota, insisting, “Look, there’s something wrong with Walz!” His words, coupled with a post featuring a laughing emoji on the White House’s social media account, showcased his unfiltered rhetoric and deepening feud with Minnesota’s Democratic leadership.
At the heart of this controversy lies Trump’s assertion that Minnesota has become “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity,” alleging that Somali gangs “are terrorizing the people of that great State,” and that “BILLIONS of Dollars are missing.” However, no evidence supported these explosive claims. Legal experts were quick to challenge Trump’s assertions, particularly regarding his announcement to terminate the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somalis in Minnesota. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council asserted, “There is literally no legal means by which he can do this.” The TPS for Somalis is set to last until March 2026, requiring a formal review process for any changes.
The TPS program, initiated in 1991 due to the violent conditions in Somalia, has withstood political shifts across multiple administrations. Currently, only about 705 Somali nationals hold this status in the U.S., with 430 residing in Minnesota. This number represents a small fraction of the Somali population in the state, which exceeds 50,000.
Responses to Trump’s comments came swiftly from advocates and elected officials in Minnesota. Governor Walz declared, “Donald Trump insulting me is a badge of honor for me,” emphasizing the damaging nature of Trump’s language. He characterized the president’s rhetoric as harmful and indicative of a broader normalization of hateful expressions. In defending his handling of a fraud scandal involving misuse of COVID-19 funds, Walz noted that while some individuals involved had Somali backgrounds, it was irresponsible to paint an entire community with the same brush. “To demonize an entire community on the actions of a few—it’s lazy,” he stated.
The alleged fraud was not as extensive as Trump claimed. Although it involved tens of millions of dollars linked to federal pandemic programs, law enforcement reported no evidence tying it to broader gang activity or billions of dollars in losses. The FBI’s investigation led to charges against 60 individuals, underscoring that the situation is not what Trump suggested.
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar responded firmly, dismissing Trump’s comments as mere race-baiting. “I am a citizen and so are (the) majority of Somalis in America,” she remarked, challenging the narrative Trump sought to perpetuate. Jaylani Hussein, president of the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, echoed this sentiment, arguing that Trump’s rhetoric constitutes a blatant attack on the Somali and Muslim community.
Legal experts have pointed to the implications of Trump’s declarations. Though the Department of Homeland Security is responsible for TPS, Trump’s threats to revoke it could undermine due process. The TPS statute mandates that decisions on renewals or terminations be informed by actual conditions in the originating country and not influenced by political narratives. Heidi Altman from the National Immigration Law Center remarked, “There’s no legal mechanism that allows the president to terminate protected status for a particular community or state that he has beef with.”
Critics of Walz do acknowledge shortcomings in his administration’s response to the fraud case, yet they argue that he has implemented increased oversight since its revelation. Minnesota’s Attorney General, Keith Ellison, asserted that Trump’s actions are baseless and cannot effectively be executed through personal vendettas.
The implications for Somali TPS holders are profound. This status not only protects them from deportation but also grants work authorization. With many having established deep roots in the U.S. over decades, the threat of termination looms ominously. Organizations like the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota warn of the potential family separations and upheavals that could result from such a policy shift.
Hussein summarized the concern felt among Minnesota residents: “It deeply concerns residents here when a former president throws around words that degrade people while offering no factual basis for policy changes.” The gravity of the situation is underscored by the realization that the stakes extend beyond political theater for many families.
As Trump repositions himself for a 2024 campaign, his rhetoric continues to reflect a focus on immigration and cultural issues. His statements insinuate that Democratic-controlled areas represent disorder and dysfunction, framing his political narrative around grievance and division.
While the legal ramifications of Trump’s declarations remain uncertain, the real-life implications for Somali TPS holders hang in the balance. Though Trump’s comments might serve his political ambitions, the potential fallout for individuals and families caught in the crossfire of his rhetoric is undeniably serious.
"*" indicates required fields
