White House envoy Steve Witkoff is making a significant move as he prepares to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. This meeting follows intensive negotiations with Ukrainian officials over the weekend, focused on securing a peace deal. The stakes are high as Witkoff, alongside Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, seeks to gauge Putin’s reaction to the finalized 19-point proposal, a product of earlier U.S.-Russian talks. This latest push represents a notable escalation in diplomatic efforts since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.
Yet, obstacles remain. Core disputes persist regarding territorial issues, Ukraine’s long-term security measures, and the conditions required for any ceasefire. Negotiators stress that the success of the meetings hinges on Putin’s willingness to adapt. The journey to this point hasn’t been easy. An initial 28-point plan, created by Witkoff and Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev, was rejected by Kyiv for being overly favorable to Moscow, leading U.S. and Ukrainian officials to reassess their strategy. Meetings in Geneva in late November and subsequent discussions in Florida over the weekend aimed to refine their approach.
The discussions have been characterized as productive, although officials refrain from sharing specifics about the contentious issues that still separate the two parties. “So much work remains,” said Secretary of State Marco Rubio, acknowledging the challenges ahead while describing the session as a step forward. “But today was again a very productive and useful session where I think additional progress was made,” he added, signaling cautious optimism within the negotiations. Donald Trump echoed this sentiment, noting, “There’s a good chance we can make a deal.”
However, the disparity between the two sides is stark. A key point of contention lies in NATO membership. Russia adamantly insists that Ukraine cannot join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, despite Ukraine’s constitutional amendment declaring NATO membership a national aspiration. The original plan from Russia also requested a reduction of Ukrainian peacetime forces to 600,000 personnel, while many European and Ukrainian officials proposed an 800,000 cap, reflecting Ukraine’s military expansion in response to the invasion.
The most significant hurdle remains the issue of territorial concessions. Initial drafts indicated potential Russian recognition of Crimea, along with substantial portions of the Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia regions. Compounding these challenges is the recent resignation of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s chief of staff and chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak. His exit, triggered by a corruption investigation, casts uncertainty over Ukraine’s negotiating position. Just days prior to his resignation, Yermak insisted, “Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory,” demonstrating the staunch commitment to maintaining Ukraine’s sovereignty.
As the talks approach a critical moment, Putin has maintained that Russia is positioned to dictate terms, expressing a readiness for serious discussions while simultaneously asserting that fighting will cease only when Ukrainian forces retreat from the territories they have reclaimed. “If they don’t withdraw, we will achieve this by force,” he warned, highlighting the ongoing tension in the negotiations.
Analysts note that Washington retains potential leverage should these negotiations falter. Options include tightening sanctions or ramping up military assistance to Ukraine. However, many significant economic penalties have already been implemented, targeting major Russian energy and financial sectors. The U.S. has also provided extensive military support totaling billions since 2022, leaving fewer alternative strategies to pursue if talks stagnate.
Frustration with the pace of diplomacy has been expressed by Trump, who recently remarked that a resolution “should have happened a long time ago.” Despite this dissatisfaction, officials indicate that Washington is not ready to abandon the talks entirely. The coming days will be crucial as peace efforts are evaluated against the backdrop of historical tensions and the intricacies of modern diplomacy.
"*" indicates required fields
