In recent years, the intersection of politics and spirituality has been a hotbed of controversy, with the situation at Lake Street Church in Evanston, Illinois, serving as a prime example. The far left’s encroachment into increasingly progressive church leadership reveals a profound disconnect with traditional Christian teachings. The church’s latest nativity scene—featuring a zip-tied baby Jesus alongside agents resembling ICE personnel—demonstrates just how far some congregations have strayed from their original mission.
Lake Street Church has garnered attention for politicizing a sacred story. Instead of reverently depicting the birth of Christ, the scene twists the nativity into a commentary on contemporary immigration policies. “This installation reimagines the nativity as a scene of forced family separation,” the church claims. They attempt to draw a parallel between the Holy Family’s journey and present-day immigration issues. Such attempts to merge the spiritual with the political risk trivializing the very essence of Christianity.
This portrayal raises serious questions about the motives behind this artistic choice. The nativity is not a canvas for political protest; rather, it is a foundational narrative of hope and redemption. Using it as a vehicle for social activism cheapens its significance and invokes a sense almost akin to sacrilege. The bishops and pastors who endorse such narratives seem to confuse their religious duty with the demands of modern political discourse.
Criticism of the scene is further fueled by its context. Baby Jesus—symbolizing innocence—being depicted in zip ties creates an image that distorts rather than illuminates the struggles of families around the world. Moreover, characterizing Mary and Joseph’s flight to Egypt as akin to today’s refugee experience overlooks critical historical distinctions. The Holy Family’s journey was governed by compliance with Roman law, distinctly different from the complexities of contemporary immigration crises.
The church articulates their stance further, citing the use of gas masks worn by Mary and Joseph to reference the alleged use of tear gas by ICE agents. This hyper-politicized representation distracts from the Church’s core message. The gospel’s teachings have roots in love, forgiveness, and hope—not a divisive political agenda. The portrayal of biblical figures in contexts outside their original narratives diminishes the rich theological implications of their stories.
Other churches have resisted these progressive trends, choosing instead to maintain their focus on faith and worship. Yet, Lake Street Church embodies the increasing tendencies within certain congregations to swap biblical devotion for activism. Their website highlights “Social Justice” alongside vital church functions like worship and spiritual growth. This prioritization indicates a troubling shift in mission—one that many may reject.
Ultimately, Lake Street Church risks alienating congregants who seek spiritual nourishment rather than political rhetoric. The portrayal of the nativity scene in this manner shows a larger trend in some churches that increasingly align their teachings with contemporary progressive movements. As the divide between sacred tradition and progressive activism deepens, questions abound regarding the future of faith communities that embrace such theories.
For congregations, this moment serves as a crucial point of reflection. The narrative of the nativity is not merely a story for Christmas; it carries profound spiritual implications meant to unite rather than divide. In a world consumed by political strife, the church should stand as a beacon of hope grounded in faith, urging individuals towards spiritual growth rather than political dogma.
The folly of Lake Street Church’s artistic decision shows how easily religious symbols can be manipulated to fit contemporary narratives. It is a stark reminder of the vulnerable state of faith institutions grappling with rapid societal changes. The question remains: will more churches follow this trend, or will they stand firm in their faith, rooted in biblical truths rather than transient political agendas? The answer may shape the future of faith in America.
"*" indicates required fields
