The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is embarking on a significant reform aimed at how presidential libraries are funded. This change comes as NARA attempts to lessen the financial burden on taxpayers while ensuring these libraries can effectively maintain their mission of preserving and providing access to historical records. Currently, 14 presidential libraries operate under NARA’s oversight, with plans to add two more dedicated to Trump and Biden.
As it stands, taxpayer money is used to cover routine maintenance expenses for these libraries, including everything from lawn care to repairs. “Despite decades of well-intentioned oversight and stewardship of America’s presidential libraries, reality now dictates that operational changes can and should be made,” noted Jim Byron, a senior advisor to the archivist. This statement underscores a critical point: operational costs are becoming increasingly unmanageable under the current funding structure.
NARA allocates about $91 million each year for presidential libraries, with over $123 million tied up in deferred maintenance costs. Ongoing negotiations with presidential foundations aim to shift some of this financial responsibility away from taxpayers. By doing so, NARA hopes to save around $27 million, redirecting those funds to its primary mission—preserving and sharing historical records. Byron emphasized the urgent need for change, stating that without these reforms, NARA’s efforts will be compromised. “The alternative is to do nothing…and regret that presidential library structures were not addressed,” he warned.
Experts align their thoughts with NARA’s direction. Luke Nichter, a history professor who engages deeply with presidential libraries for research, suggests that it is imperative for presidential foundations to assume greater responsibility. “It now takes about as much money to build a presidential library as it does to run for president—about a billion dollars,” he remarked. This striking comparison underscores the untenable nature of the current funding model reliant on taxpayer dollars.
The foundations supporting presidential libraries typically use private funds to build them, which NARA subsequently oversees with federal funding. However, not all foundations operate under identical agreements. The Obama Foundation, for example, has opted to create a private presidential center, thereby bypassing NARA’s oversight for document storage entirely. Instead, NARA continues to manage Obama’s records at a separate facility. This highlights the variability within the presidential library system and raises questions about the sustainability of relying on a patchwork of funding structures.
Historical context is essential here. Similar funding revamps occurred successfully in 2018, when NARA collaborated with various presidential foundations to address cost-sharing amid tightening federal budgets. That effort led to a new agreement with the George W. Bush Foundation, reflecting the adaptability necessary in today’s economic climate.
NARA’s recent push for reform is not merely about reducing costs—it’s about ensuring the preservation and dissemination of federal and presidential records remain a priority. Initiatives aimed at releasing critical historical documents, including those related to John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Amelia Earhart, are part of this renewed focus. By shifting the operational responsibilities more towards the presidential foundations, NARA can better allocate its resources and expertise where they are most needed.
The conversation surrounding the funding of presidential libraries touches on broader themes of accountability and sustainability within government agencies. As NARA navigates these changes, it must strike a balance between historical preservation and fiscal responsibility. Byron’s commitment to reform is a step in the right direction—focusing on the future of these institutions while managing the expectations of taxpayers.
"*" indicates required fields
