Since taking office in January 2025, President Donald Trump’s administration has made significant strides in immigration enforcement, reporting that over 2 million illegal immigrants have been removed or have exited voluntarily. This figure comes from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and has been underscored by various immigration enforcement agencies. A post by RightLineNews celebrated this achievement, echoing a sense of pride in the administration’s aggressive stance: “LET’S GO! 2 million illegal aliens have been removed from the United States since President Trump took office!”
This milestone signals a dramatic increase in immigration enforcement compared to the previous administration. The removals resulted from a combination of ICE arrests, expedited deportations, and new programs that encourage voluntary departure. This multi-faceted strategy is at the forefront of what Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem describes as a “law-first, results-driven” approach, aiming to restore order and legality at the border.
In a statement during a Fox News interview, Noem noted, “We have 1.6 million illegal immigrants that have left this country voluntarily.” She emphasized that this shift aligns with Trump’s commitment to strict adherence to immigration law: “President Trump told me, ‘We’re going to follow the law—no longer will we tolerate people being in our country illegally.'” This assertion illustrates a determined departure from previous policies perceived to be more lenient.
ICE has played a critical role in the administration’s strategy, with more than 400,000 deportations executed through standard enforcement actions. Data from DHS indicates that ICE agents detained over 352,000 illegal aliens in the first 200 days of Trump’s second term, resulting in 324,000 formal removals. This level of enforcement showcases a sharp turnaround in immigration policy and practice.
Voluntary departure has also been part of the equation, with some migrants receiving government-sponsored travel assistance and cash stipends in exchange for returning to their home countries. Notably, unaccompanied minors have the opportunity to receive up to $2,500, contingent upon approval by an immigration judge. Emily Covington, assistant director at ICE’s Office of Public Affairs, defended this program, stating, “ICE and the Office of Refugee and Resettlement at HHS are offering a strictly voluntary option to return home to their families.” This highlights the administration’s intent to minimize risks associated with migration and reflect its approach to immigration reform.
Despite the intent behind these measures, critics have raised concerns. Advocacy groups like the Acacia Center for Justice argue that these programs may undermine established protections for children and increase their vulnerability to trafficking. Shaina Aber of the Acacia Center stated, “DHS’s message is confusing and seems to fly in the face of established laws and protocols that Congress passed to protect children from cyclical trafficking risks.” The administration’s actions, while effective according to some metrics, open up a complex debate about the balance between enforcement and humanitarian considerations.
Immigration data backs up the claim of a decline in illegal crossings. According to recent figures from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), total apprehensions at the southwestern border dropped to 237,565 in Fiscal Year 2025—marking the lowest total since 1970 and an 87% reduction from previous annual averages. CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott attributed this trend to robust enforcement measures, stating, “For too long, agents and officers were handcuffed by failed policies. Today they are empowered to do their jobs—and the result is the lowest apprehensions in more than five decades.”
Statistics reveal a stark contrast in operational activity under both administrations. In the first months of Trump’s second term, border agents made only 279 apprehensions per day—a drastic 95% decrease from the Biden administration’s figures, which averaged 5,110 daily. Furthermore, September 2025 marked the fifth consecutive month in which Border Patrol did not release any illegal immigrants into the U.S. interior, a significant drop compared to previous periods of higher releases.
Observers attribute this remarkable change to several decisive policy measures initiated by the current administration. These actions included terminating the “catch-and-release” policy, halting parole applications, and repurposing existing tools to facilitate self-deportation. The administration has not only directed resources to areas of high migration but also declared a federal “invasion” to expedite enforcement actions. This assertive rhetoric and policy orientation reflect a broader aim to secure the nation’s borders.
Public sentiment around these enforcement methods is mixed. A recent poll suggests that 54% of voters support deportation efforts, but the administration’s approach has ignited heated debate. Local leaders, such as Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, have opposed federal enforcement tactics and have enacted executive orders that limit ICE operations within their jurisdictions.
Ultimately, DHS officials assert that the results validate their efforts. A spokesperson for the agency remarked, “This feat is a testament to the Trump Administration’s success in restoring control at the border.” Secretary Noem affirmed that the year has yielded record-breaking statistics, emphasizing the principle that rigorous enforcement leads to tangible improvements in border security.
This combination of strict enforcement, rapid policy changes, and voluntary departure programs has resulted in the highest removals recorded in a single calendar year since federal tracking began. The ongoing focus on immigration remains a defining element of President Trump’s presidency, and these outcomes reflect a substantial shift in America’s approach to border security and immigration enforcement.
"*" indicates required fields
