An Urgent Wake-Up Call for Republicans in Tennessee
Tennessee Congressman Tim Burchett has sounded an alarm about the Republican Party’s complacency ahead of a crucial special election. His warning comes at a pivotal time as GOP candidate Matt Van Epps faces a surprising challenge from Democrat Aftyn Behn in the traditionally safe 7th Congressional District. Burchett’s concerns reflect deeper issues within the party that go beyond this single race.
Burchett noted that a significant portion of the Republican base is not voting. “Evangelical Christians… 45% of them don’t go to the polls,” he said, further highlighting that “thirty percent of gun owners don’t go to the polls!” Such low turnout rates could threaten not only the party’s hold on the 7th District but its slim majority in the House. The urgency of his message was amplified in a tweet, where he reiterated the risk: “Our schools are mass producing Marxists… we better wake up!”
The 7th District, a blend of suburban and rural areas in Middle Tennessee, has long been a Republican stronghold. In 2020, former President Donald Trump bested his opponent by over 20 points here. Yet, right before the special election, polling showed Van Epps leading Behn by a mere two points—an unsettling sign given the district’s history.
Burchett pinpointed cultural shifts and ideological changes as contributing factors. He stated, “It’s not these people moving in from California, or New York, or Chicago. It is our own homegrown Marxists that we’re bringing up.” His remarks emphasized a need to re-evaluate the influences within the education system that he believes are shaping today’s youth.
Aftyn Behn, the Democratic candidate, has invigorated younger voters and the party’s progressive base, thanks in part to her endorsements from prominent groups. On the other hand, Van Epps, a combat veteran and businessman, has garnered high-profile backing from leading Republicans, including Trump. Despite these endorsements, voter turnout has remained tepid. Burchett lamented minor weather disruptions affecting turnout, saying even a “half-inch of snow” could deter voters.
Burchett’s worries extend beyond the immediate election. He questioned how a qualified candidate like Van Epps could struggle in a district that Trump has won by a substantial margin. “If Matt Van Epps can’t carry this thing, we’re in trouble,” he said, indicating that it could signify broader challenges for the GOP leading into 2026.
His criticism of Behn was equally sharp. “She will make AOC look like she subscribes to the National Review,” he said, casting her as a far-left candidate whose policies could drastically shift the district’s political landscape. Van Epps’s campaign has also targeted Behn’s previous comments about her disdain for the local culture, underscoring an attempt to frame her as disconnected from the values of the district.
Van Epps has aligned his campaign with “America First” principles, addressing key issues such as energy dependence, border security, and protecting religious liberties. In stark contrast, Behn has focused on healthcare access and environmental protections. This ideological clash illustrates the broader divide brewing within American politics and highlights the stakes for both candidates.
The consequences of this election extend beyond the local level; a loss here could threaten the Republican Party’s fragile grip on the House. Burchett has made clear that each seat matters in the current political climate. “We’re one vote series away from losing the republic,” he warned, framing the special election as a critical juncture.
Recent electoral data reveals a startling trend. In 2022, Republicans won the district with nearly 60% of the vote, a stark contrast to the narrowing margins now in play. This increase in competitiveness has drawn national attention and investments from both parties, a clear signal of the race’s importance.
Burchett’s assertion that “this should not even be a race” points to a troubling gap between Republican voter registration and actual voter turnout. His claims resonate with GOP strategists who are increasingly alarmed by the failure of core demographics—Evangelicals, gun owners, and rural voters—to engage in the electoral process. “This is what happens when 12% of the population votes,” he said, emphasizing the stakes involved.
Tennessee’s special election serves as a cautionary tale. It has prompted active outreach from national Republican leaders, including fundraising efforts and visibility campaigns in local churches. Polls closed at 7 p.m. Central Time, and while there were no significant disruptions reported, the outcome remains uncertain.
This close contest illuminates the necessity for the GOP to address a burgeoning voter enthusiasm gap if it hopes to perform strongly in upcoming elections. Burchett’s statement is potent: “They woke up in Tennessee and they got to the polls. That’s what it’s going to take.”
As the Republican Party formulates its strategy leading into the future, Tennessee’s unexpected electoral drama stands as a formidable lesson. In a district once secured effortlessly, shifting cultural dynamics and apparent apathy among the base have created an unexpected opening for Democrats—an opening that could widen if left unaddressed.
"*" indicates required fields
