Yonatan Samerano was just 21 years old, full of potential, when he became one of the tragic victims of Hamas’s October 7 attacks. What transpired next is a stark reminder of the brutality of this conflict. Eyewitnesses shared that after his death, two men were seen dragging his body into a car. These men were later identified as employees of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in Gaza. This incident, chilling in its details, takes on a larger significance when combined with the emerging evidence of UNRWA’s troubling role in recent violence.
The stories that have surfaced since October 7 reveal disturbing patterns within UNRWA. Reports indicate that some staff members not only witnessed horrors but actively participated in them. This includes shocking claims of a UNRWA worker who shared photographs and recordings, boasting about acts of violence and illustrating the organization’s connection to Hamas. Instances of weapons and terrorist infrastructure being found in UNRWA facilities further complicate its stated mission of humanitarian aid. These revelations paint a grim picture for anyone relying on this agency as a neutral entity.
Notably, the Meyerson JCC in Manhattan recently hosted a screening of the documentary “UNraveling UNRWA,” which critiques the organization’s history and behaviors. The film exposes how UNRWA has transformed from a humanitarian agency into what many see as a cover for Hamas, fostering an environment rife with antisemitism and radical ideology among young minds. This indoctrination has cultivated a culture of hatred that has dire implications for both Jewish and Palestinian communities.
Against this backdrop of rising antisemitism and global concern regarding UNRWA, the actions of New York City’s Mayor-elect, Zohran Mamdani, raise pressing questions. Before winning the election, Mamdani participated in a “5K for Gaza” event in Brooklyn, benefiting UNRWA directly. This choice is more than a political error; it resonates as a severe moral misjudgment. Supporting an agency linked to violence and indoctrination undermines the values that communities hold dear. It signals a failure to prioritize the safety and well-being of New Yorkers, especially those within the Jewish community, who are facing increased threats since the attacks.
The screening of “UNraveling UNRWA” provides vital context for understanding the consequences of complacency. UNRWA’s historical trajectory is a testament to how some humanitarian organizations can shift from their original missions to serve insidious agendas. They may perpetuate delusions of the “right of return” and other narratives that fuel conflict rather than resolve it. By throwing his support behind UNRWA, Mamdani risks complicating New York City’s diverse political landscape, placing ideological consistency above the much-needed cohesion that communities strive for.
The choice to be silent in the face of such troubling realities can be seductive. It’s often easier to look the other way, not confront advocates for change, and avoid the backlash that may ensue. However, such silence inevitably allows malevolent forces to gain momentum. Ignoring or sanitizing the actions of those involved can embolden a culture of extremism. The price for this negligence is a burden that future generations will likely bear—one that involves a loss of safety, unity, and societal clarity.
As communities navigate these tumultuous waters, the importance of moral clarity is paramount. The decisions made in leadership positions should reflect not only a commitment to their constituents but also a recognition of the broader ramifications of supporting organizations like UNRWA. Every effort must be made to confront these difficult truths and engage in dialogues that prioritize safety and mutual respect, especially amidst current global tensions.
"*" indicates required fields
