During a recent press event, former President Donald Trump unleashed a torrent of criticism against Somali immigrants in the U.S., specifically targeting Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. In a heated statement, he implied that Somalis contribute nothing meaningful to American society. “Without this country, she probably wouldn’t be alive right now,” Trump asserted, referring to Omar, a notable figure in the Minnesota Somali community.
He continued with a dismissive tone, saying, “All they do is complain, complain, complain… ‘the Constitution!’ Go back to your own country and figure out your constitution!” This outburst drew immediate backlash from Minnesota officials and immigrant advocacy groups, as noted in a viral tweet capturing the moment. Trump expressed his disdain for Somalia itself, claiming, “Somalia is considered by many to be the worst country on earth. I’ve never been there. Won’t be there any time soon… I hope!”
Minnesota, home to the largest Somali population in the U.S., has seen significant immigration from the region, particularly as refugees fled civil unrest. Yet Trump’s administration had previously sought to dismantle the refugee resettlement program and seems poised to revive that agenda amid claims of welfare fraud and accusations of national security risks associated with Somali residents. He confirmed intentions to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somalis, which provides legal protections to immigrants from conflict-affected countries. Currently, about 705 Somalis in the U.S. benefit from this program.
The root of Trump’s assertions lies in allegations of financial misconduct. Various conservative media outlets have circulated claims of up to $1 billion in fraudulent food assistance claims linked to Somali individuals, although law enforcement has found no evidence that ethnic networks were driving the fraud. Moreover, unfounded claims have surfaced connecting these allegations to terrorism, particularly pointing fingers at groups like al-Shabab. Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist, also raised the alarm, suggesting Somali offenders were “looting taxpayer funds and laundering money abroad.”
In stark contrast, local Minnesota leaders quickly mobilized to defend the Somali community. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey remarked on their contributions to local business and job creation, calling Trump’s comments “ridiculous.” St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter referred to the President’s language as “un-American,” stating it undermined the values that residents cherish. Governor Tim Walz also championed the idea that everyone, regardless of origin, deserves respect and opportunity.
Omar, who fled civil war in Somalia and now holds a congressional seat, labeled Trump’s fixation on her as “creepy.” She used social media to express solidarity with Somali communities, stating that they “make our state and country great.”
The context of Trump’s comments was further complicated by a recent violent act involving an Afghan national, although he used the incident to paint immigrants from so-called “third-world countries” in a negative light. Critics argue that Trump’s rhetoric promotes harmful stereotypes, unjustly attributing individual actions to entire ethnic groups.
Additionally, there is an uptick in immigration enforcement efforts targeting Somali nationals in Minnesota, creating a climate of fear within the community. Advocacy groups report that many immigrants are feeling anxious about their legal status amid the intensified scrutiny.
Contrary to Trump’s depiction, data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development highlights the rising contributions of Somali immigrants, who have experienced growth in entrepreneurship, higher education, and homeownership since 2010. Somali-Americans own hundreds of small businesses in vital sectors of the economy, yet challenges remain, particularly in poverty rates and access to educational resources.
The backlash from Somali voices abroad also reflects discontent with Trump’s statements. In Mogadishu, Bule Ismail suggested that the U.S. needs to intervene for Trump’s mental health, while Somali elder Abdisalan Omar emphasized that such rhetoric from a U.S. president is harmful to both nations. Even Somalia’s Prime Minister called for a measured response, indicating that some comments do not warrant a reaction.
This is not the first instance where Trump has targeted Omar. His past comments urging her and other congresswomen of color to “go back” to their countries have left an indelible mark in the political landscape, showing how accusations of un-Americanism often focus on racial and ethnic lines. Critics note that Omar’s citizenship and achievements do not protect her from racially charged attacks.
Trump’s fixation on Somali communities encapsulates his broader political strategy: stoking fears of foreign threats, expressing skepticism about immigration, and targeting progressive figures. Though these tactics may rally his base, they also intensify divisions over national identity and the value of contributions made by immigrants.
As the 2024 election approaches, Trump’s remarks may indicate a shift toward aggressive immigration rhetoric that prioritizes national security over individual stories of success. Whether this strategy will effectively influence policy, voter sentiment, or public opinion remains uncertain, but it certainly underscores the contentious debate surrounding immigration in America today.
"*" indicates required fields
