Sen. Josh Hawley Proposes Making All Health Care Expenses Tax-Free
Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has introduced a significant piece of legislation aimed at altering the tax burden associated with health care expenses. His proposal seeks to eliminate federal income taxes on such costs, positioning it as a necessary relief for American families facing rising medical bills.
During a press conference, Hawley challenged the status quo, asking, “Why shouldn’t we make health care tax free in this country?” His question underscores a simple yet compelling argument: why should essential health care costs be treated differently than wages from tips and overtime work? This proposal, known as the “No Taxes on Healthcare Act,” aims to ease the financial strain on families overwhelmed by medical expenses.
Targeting a System That Leaves Out 90% of Families
The current tax system only allows individuals who itemize deductions and spend over 7.5% of their adjusted gross income (AGI) on medical expenses to receive any tax relief. This restriction impacts about 10% of households, leaving the remaining 90% without any tax advantages for their medical spending. Hawley’s plan aims to rectify this disparity by making the deduction “above the line,” allowing all taxpayers to deduct up to $25,000 for qualified medical expenses, regardless of their deduction filing method.
This change could significantly decrease the taxable income for countless families. For example, a family of four with substantial out-of-pocket medical expenses could reduce their federal tax liability, providing much-needed financial relief even if they opt for the standard deduction.
Addressing a Growing Financial Burden
The proposal responds directly to the alarming trend of escalating health care costs driving families into debt. Data from Gallup reveals that 31 million Americans borrowed money within the last year to pay for medical bills. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that 41% of adults in the U.S. have some form of medical debt—often due to uncovered routine care and emergency services. This financial strain disproportionately affects working and middle-class families, who typically lack access to employer-sponsored flexible spending accounts or health savings accounts. As Hawley noted, “That means 90 percent of American families get zero tax relief for healthcare costs.”
His legislation seeks to level the playing field by equating the treatment of health care expenses with recent tax policies that benefited wages from overtime and tips. By doing so, Hawley aims to offer substantial relief while maintaining the existing structure of American health care.
Building on Republican Affordability Measures
This initiative aligns with broader Republican efforts focused on making health care more affordable through targeted tax relief, as opposed to increased federal spending. Earlier this year, Congress enacted measures that eliminated federal income taxes on overtime pay and service industry tips, initiatives that Hawley references in support of his health care tax plan. “Using a similar mechanism as President Trump’s ‘no tax on tips’ and ‘no tax on overtime’ policies, this legislation can wipe out federal income taxes for families who experience high health costs,” he stated.
As a Republican senator, Hawley has carved out a niche as a pro-worker advocate, positioning himself as a key voice around issues of economic policy within the party. His focus on affordability is a strategic move, setting the foundation for an approach that aims to appeal to voters ahead of the next election cycle.
Potential Effects on Families
If passed, Hawley’s legislation could yield thousands of dollars in annual tax savings for families with qualifying medical expenses. A couple with two dependents spending $15,000 annually on health-related costs would be eligible to deduct that expense fully. This deduction extends to all types of qualified health care spending, regardless of whether individuals receive that care through employer plans or private providers. This flexibility could notably benefit independent contractors, part-time employees, and retirees—groups often underserved by employer-based insurance systems.
A Broader Legislative Pattern
Hawley’s introduction of this legislation follows a pattern observed in his previous attempts to protect vital health care funding, as demonstrated by his Protect Medicaid and Rural Hospitals Act. That bill aimed to address funding cuts to Medicaid while driving reforms that support rural health initiatives. His actions consistently reflect a commitment to maintaining health care access—particularly in the rural states he represents.
Challenges and Possible Obstacles
Despite its populist appeal, Hawley’s health care tax proposal is not without challenges. Democratic lawmakers likely favor direct subsidies and regulatory changes over tax-based solutions to rising health care costs. Additionally, within Hawley’s own party, fiscal conservatives may question the prospect of the legislation’s long-term impact on federal revenue amid rising debts.
However, by connecting this proposal with previous bipartisan tax relief efforts, Hawley may garner the support needed from moderates who advocate for targeted breaks without elevating federal expenses. Furthermore, the absence of controversial mandates could facilitate the legislation’s passage through budget reconciliation, allowing for a simple Senate majority vote.
Looking Ahead
With a significant portion of the American populace burdened by medical debt, the rationale behind Hawley’s proposal becomes clear. It aims to alter the tax framework surrounding health care, which has remained relatively stagnant for years. While the political will to reform this aspect of taxation remains uncertain, Hawley appears committed to advancing the discussion. His assertion, “How about no taxes on health care?” encapsulates a straightforward call for change that may resonate with voters disillusioned by ongoing health care debates.
"*" indicates required fields
