The final report from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) provides a sobering account of the aftermath of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. According to the report, U.S. taxpayer-funded equipment, weapons, and facilities left behind have now become central to the Taliban’s security operations. Over nearly two decades, the U.S. allocated approximately $144.7 billion for reconstruction efforts, a mission shrouded in the promise of bringing stability and democracy to Afghanistan. The SIGAR report asserts, however, that it ultimately delivered neither.
The report underscores the failure to secure the future of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) after the collapse of the Afghan government. The Department of Defense (DoD) identified about $7.1 billion worth of material and equipment left behind for the ANDSF. SIGAR’s findings indicate a troubling transformation—these resources now form the backbone of Taliban security capabilities. The implications of this shift cast a long shadow over the U.S.’s investment in the region and raise questions about the decision-making processes that led to this outcome.
Amid the chaos of the withdrawal, SIGAR emphasized that the operational status of the equipment left for Afghan forces was largely unknown. While Afghan forces reportedly held 316,260 weapons valued at $511.8 million, the ability to effectively utilize these items was questionable. This uncertainty highlights a stark reality: despite significant resources poured into training and equipping the ANDSF, their operational readiness was severely lacking, contributing to their rapid collapse when U.S. forces departed.
Gene Aloise, Acting Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, pointed to “multiple factors” for the failure of the U.S. mission. Key among them was a strategy that relied heavily on corrupt powerbrokers who exacerbated the security situation rather than alleviated it. Aloise noted, “Early and ongoing U.S. decisions to ally with corrupt, human-rights-abusing powerbrokers bolstered the insurgency and undermined the mission.” This admission raises fundamental questions about U.S. strategies, suggesting that alliances formed might have countered U.S. objectives rather than supporting them.
The report further revealed that despite nearly $90 billion appropriated for security sector assistance, Afghan security forces proved unsustainable without ongoing U.S. military support. This dependency underscores a crucial flaw in the military strategy employed in Afghanistan. The SIGAR report suggests that the ANDSF was effectively designed to mirror U.S. forces, creating a reliance on higher levels of professional military sophistication that were simply unattainable in the Afghan context. The decision to withdraw significantly impacted morale among Afghan soldiers and police forces, compounding the challenges they faced. As noted by SIGAR: “These long-term dependencies… destroyed the morale of Afghan soldiers and police.”
Despite the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban, the United States has continued to be the largest donor to the nation, disbursing over $3.83 billion in humanitarian and development assistance since the withdrawal. In the first quarter of 2025, alone, U.S. disbursements amounted to $120 million. This ongoing support indicates a continued commitment to the Afghan people, but it also raises critical questions about the effectiveness of such aid in a landscape dominated by Taliban rule.
As the SIGAR report makes clear, the situation in Afghanistan is complex, marked by years of investment that have not yielded the desired results. The lessons learned from this account could shape future U.S. involvement abroad, particularly in areas characterized by similar instability and governance challenges. The legacy of the Afghanistan mission calls for a reevaluation of strategies to engage with nations wrestling with deep-rooted issues of governance, human rights, and security.
"*" indicates required fields
