The recent mayoral race in Albuquerque, New Mexico, has stirred considerable discussion, reflecting a notable shift in political sentiment in a city long viewed as a Democratic stronghold. The preliminary results of the November 7 election showed a narrowing gap between the incumbent Democrat, Mayor Tim Keller, and his Republican challenger, Darren White. Results indicated a 9-point reduction in the Democratic margin compared to the previous presidential election. This change signals broader trends in voter attitudes and priorities.
In the 2020 presidential election, Kamala Harris, as the Democratic vice presidential candidate, dominated Albuquerque with a 24-point lead. In the mayoral race, Keller’s edge over White shrank to just 15 points—an astonishing turnaround that should be a wake-up call for Democrats in the area. Unofficial election returns revealed Keller with 38% of the vote against White’s 31%, triggering a runoff election set for December 9, 2023, as neither candidate reached the 50% threshold for an outright win.
One driving force behind White’s unexpected performance is likely related to escalating concerns over local issues such as crime, homelessness, and drug abuse. These challenges have taken center stage in conversations among constituents, prompting growing discomfort with current leadership and opening doors for Republican candidates. This increased competitiveness suggests voters may be seeking alternatives to traditional Democratic candidates in response to pressing problems.
Polling data leading up to the election highlights these sentiments. A late September survey indicated that Keller faced a 47% disapproval rating, with only 29% of voters expressing support for his re-election. Among Democrats, only 43% backed him, while Republican support stood at a mere 8%. This discontent among constituents presents an ongoing concern for Keller’s campaign. In contrast, White, who garnered a 16% polling figure leading into the election, effectively mobilized support from Republicans and some undecided voters frustrated with the current state of affairs.
Voter turnout also sent signals about engagement levels. The Bernalillo County Clerk’s Office reported turnout rates comparable to those seen in 2021, with about 32% of eligible voters participating. County Clerk Michelle Kavanaugh noted, “Republicans tend to stick to Election Day voting, but they are slowly starting to trust early and absentee voting more than they used to.” This evolving trust in the electoral process could indicate a growing commitment among Republican voters, complicating the landscape for Democrats.
Keller acknowledged the challenges, attributing the tight race to various national and local issues. “Now the city’s in tough times,” he stated, referencing the rise of fentanyl use and ongoing housing shortages. He conceded that his decision to veto legislation aimed at eliminating runoffs possibly cost him critical support. “That was a veto for what is right for democracy, and it was a veto against my own best interest,” he reflected.
For White, this outcome could serve as a crucial moment in framing his campaign. He characterized the election results as a referendum on Keller’s leadership, stating, “If you think that we can do better — and we can do better — I ask you to join my campaign and bring the change that is needed to Albuquerque.” This appeal underscores a strategic pivot that recognizes the growing unease about the city’s trajectory.
Broader political trends are surfacing within Bernalillo County. Recent voter registration data points to a decline in partisan Democratic affiliation alongside an increase in voters identifying as unaffiliated. While Republicans have maintained their numbers, their engagement on localized issues has become more effective. For White, this presents an opportunity to enhance his support base in the coming weeks, especially by courting voters who previously backed other candidates, such as former U.S. Attorney Alex Uballez, who won 19% of the vote. Uballez’s lack of a clear endorsement for Keller positions him as a potentially pivotal figure in the runoff, particularly if his supporters decide to abstain from voting.
With political analysts noting that Uballez’s backing could be decisive, Keller faces a critical challenge in uniting a fragmented liberal base. White, on the other hand, must attract independents and moderate Democrats disillusioned with the current administration. The upcoming runoff will provide both candidates an intense arena to shape their coalitions and address the community issues that matter most to voters.
Fundraising efforts could also prove pivotal in this contest. Keller entered the general election with a significant financial advantage, boasting over $734,000 in public financing. White, however, has been making steady strides in grassroots fundraising, although he continues to trail in overall spending. Such financial factors could shape advertising strategies and voter outreach as each campaign seeks to solidify support.
The nonpartisan runoff system in Albuquerque allows only the top two candidates to advance, complicating the landscape for candidates aiming for a decisive victory. Keller previously faced a runoff in 2017 but successfully secured the majority in the second round. His current situation reflects a markedly different electorate, one less inclined to afford Democrats an easy path to victory.
The 9-point Republican gain in Albuquerque illustrates a novel political volatility in a region once considered solidly Democratic. Observers will watch closely to see whether this shift marks a permanent change or is a reflection of specific local discontent. As both parties prepare for the December runoff, the stakes are undeniably high. The changing dynamics in Albuquerque may signal a broader reconsideration of political allegiance in the face of pressing local challenges. The outcome will likely hinge on campaign strategies and the ability of both candidates to connect authentically with an increasingly engaged electorate.
"*" indicates required fields
