Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem did not hold back during her recent appearance on Fox News’ “Hannity.” She unleashed a fierce critique of New York’s newly elected mayor, Zohran Mamdani, asserting that his actions may well violate the Constitution. The catalyst for her outrage was a video posted by Mamdani, in which he provides guidance to residents on how to evade Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
In that video, Mamdani vowed to protect all immigrant communities, including those who are in the country illegally. “As mayor, I’ll protect the rights of every single New Yorker and that includes the more than 3 million immigrants who call this city their home,” he declared. He went on to detail how residents could resist ICE, emphasizing that agents cannot enter private spaces without a judicial warrant. “You have the right to say, ‘I do not consent to entry,’ and the right to keep your door closed,” Mamdani insisted.
Noem’s response was swift and pointed. She claimed that if Mamdani were to become mayor and continue issuing such advice, he would be “violating the Constitution.” She elaborated further, stating that such rhetoric does not just undermine the law; it may also foster violence against those in law enforcement. She recounted incidents where ICE officers faced hostility, stating, “That rhetoric absolutely encourages these violent attacks.” Her remarks underscore just how serious she views this issue—pointing to specific events like a congresswoman attacking an ICE officer.
The secretary’s critique extended beyond one individual. She condemned the broader Democratic leadership for their attacks on ICE, arguing that they should lead by example rather than incite disrespect toward law enforcement. “We would be ashamed of our kids for acting the way that these grown adults act,” Noem said, capturing the frustration felt by many who value law and order.
Noem did not stop there. She charged that politicians who oppose existing immigration laws should work to change them rather than reject them outright. “If they don’t like the law, then go frickin’ change it,” Noem asserted, framing it as their responsibility to engage in constructive debate.
These remarks from Noem underscore a growing concern among those who prioritize legal adherence and the protection of law enforcement personnel. In Mamdani’s approach, critics see a disregard for the law that could have far-reaching consequences, not just for law enforcement but for broader society as well.
It’s clear that this issue is more than just a political dispute. It showcases a fundamental divide over how immigration policy should be debated and implemented. As Noem pointed out, there are ways to advocate for change without undermining the enforcement mechanisms that are vital to maintaining order and safety. The spotlight is now on whether Mamdani will reconsider his approach as he prepares to take office.
"*" indicates required fields
