The Senate has taken a significant step by advancing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2026, marked by an overwhelming bipartisan vote on Monday. This vital legislation allocates billions for the Pentagon and various defense-related initiatives. The bill passed a procedural hurdle with a commanding 76-20 vote, paving the way for final approval later this week. Lawmakers will soon have the opportunity to propose amendments before it heads for a vote.
This year’s NDAA amounts to approximately $901 billion, exceeding President Donald Trump’s initial request by about $8 billion. Traditionally, the NDAA serves as a crucial benchmark for Congress, acting as one of the few essential bills that legislators must pass each year. With no impending government funding deadlines, the NDAA is garnering significant focus in the Senate.
Amid the legislative push, Congress faces a busy agenda before breaking for the new year. Lawmakers are looking to tackle multiple pressing items, including the urgent need to extend expiring Obamacare subsidies and confirm nearly 100 of Trump’s nominees. Additionally, a proposed five-bill funding package is on the table that could help mitigate the risks of another government shutdown come January 30.
Within the sprawling 3,000 pages of the NDAA are numerous provisions addressing long-standing military authorities and engagement protocols. Notably, the current NDAA seeks to abolish the 1991 and 2002 authorizations for use of military force (AUMFs) related to the Gulf and Iraq wars. This shared objective highlights bipartisan accord among lawmakers, eager to repeal these outdated measures that have allowed previous administrations to commit U.S. forces in the Middle East for years.
A particularly pointed aspect of the legislation involves transparency regarding the Pentagon’s travel budget requirements. One provision mandates the Pentagon to release all unedited footage from the Trump administration’s strikes against suspected drug boats, addressing Congress’s bipartisan concerns about military conduct. Following the controversial double-tap strike on September 2, a call for greater transparency has resonated among various lawmakers.
However, not all provisions are moving forward without contention. A measure in the NDAA that would loosen safety standards for Washington, D.C.’s airspace has attracted criticism from lawmakers across party lines. In light of a prior midair collision that resulted in tragic fatalities, Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Chair Ted Cruz and the panel’s top Democrat, Sen. Maria Cantwell, are advocating for the removal of this problematic measure. Cruz emphasized the lack of proper clearance during its inclusion, stating, “Normally, when you’re adding a provision to the NDAA that impacts aviation, you would request clearance from the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee. No clearance was requested.”
As the legislation continues down the legislative path, it also encompasses provisions concerning Ukraine, demonstrating continued U.S. support amidst the conflict with Russia. Among these provisions is the extension of the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which would allocate $400 million annually to purchase arms from American defense manufacturers. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that the U.S. cannot abruptly cut intelligence support to Ukraine without prior notification, ensuring consistent aid and oversight of assistance flowing to Ukraine from the U.S. and its allies.
As the clock ticks toward the final vote, the NDAA remains a focal point for Congress, combining essential military spending with intricate measures aimed at ensuring accountability and adaptation in U.S. defense policy. This bipartisan effort underscores the necessity of defense funding and highlights the need for ongoing oversight and revision of legislative measures aimed at safeguarding national interests.
"*" indicates required fields
