Fox News stood apart from its rivals during President Donald Trump’s recent prime-time address, as it chose to display graphics prepared by the White House that illustrated key points about the economy. As reported by CNN’s Brian Stelter, Trump’s communications team had sent detailed slides to major television networks prior to the speech, seeking their inclusion on-air. However, it seems that the response among the big three networks—ABC, NBC, and CBS—as well as CNN, was lukewarm at best. For various reasons, including unclear sourcing of the graphics, these networks opted not to present the slides.
In contrast, Fox News showcased some of these visuals during its coverage. Sean Hannity, a prominent host on the network, utilized additional slides in his post-speech analysis. Kevin Hassett, Trump’s director of the National Economic Council, expressed disappointment regarding this selective coverage. Speaking on MS Now’s “Morning Joe,” Hassett emphasized the effort put into creating these slides, saying, “The president… spent a lot of time preparing slides that showed the data for what he was talking about.” This highlights a notable discrepancy in how networks handled the information Trump wanted to convey.
Hassett’s expectation that the slides would be widely shown underscores a frustration felt by the White House over media representation. He had anticipated seeing the slides across various channels, which did not materialize as expected, further illustrating a growing divide in media coverage. During the address, Trump characterized the economic challenges he inherited, stating, “Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it.” This message, combined with his promise to reduce soaring prices, was reinforced through the graphics, yet many viewers were left unaware of these visuals.
Trump highlighted alarming statistics under the Biden administration, claiming dramatic rises in car prices and other essentials. “Let’s look at the facts,” he stated, reiterating that car prices surged by 22 percent, gas prices rose 30 to 50 percent, and hotel rates jumped 37 percent. He argued that these high costs were now coming down, which he claimed was a direct result of his administration’s actions.
Additionally, Trump showcased how the price of Thanksgiving turkeys and eggs dropped significantly compared to the previous year. These assertions were meant to demonstrate progress in alleviating the burdens of rising costs. The release of the Consumer Price Index, which indicated a lower-than-expected year-over-year rate of 2.7 percent in November, provided further backing to his claims. This growth in economic optimism could not be overlooked, especially from a president who sought to position himself as a stabilizing force amid fluctuating inflation rates.
Interestingly, the communication strategy employed by Trump has historical precedents, notably resembling tactics used by former President Ronald Reagan, who was also known for his economic addresses featuring visual aids. Reagan’s experience as a communicator underscored the importance of presenting information in an accessible manner, particularly on economic topics. Both leaders aimed to simplify complex data for the general public, reinforcing their points with visual aids that clarified their narratives.
The fact that while Fox News embraced the White House’s approach, other networks chose to resist raises questions about media bias and the extent to which networks influence public perception. As the landscape of news continues to evolve, this scenario highlights a pivotal moment where choices by major networks directly shaped the public’s understanding of critical issues.
Ultimately, the decision by networks to showcase or ignore such graphics speaks volumes about their editorial choices. The presentation of data, particularly concerning economic recovery during turbulent times, can have far-reaching implications. The choice to feature the administration’s slides—or not—could impact viewers’ grasp of ongoing changes in the economy. This illustrates a collateral effect within media narratives that could sway public opinion based on how information is curated and displayed.
"*" indicates required fields
