America First Legal (AFL), a legal group aligned with conservative values, has made serious accusations against the Cherry Creek School District in Colorado. The group claims the district is improperly using race as a determining factor in disciplinary actions and has retaliated against staff who oppose these practices. This assertion is backed by evidence that suggests a troubling pattern of discrimination within the district’s disciplinary system.
In its civil rights complaint, AFL highlights an incident involving two students—one Black and one Asian. Both were reportedly involved in similar misconduct, yet only the Asian student faced consequences. This discrepancy raises questions about the fairness and consistency of the school’s disciplinary actions. The group also presented recordings they acquired in which school administrators allegedly acknowledge interference from the district’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) chief concerning discipline based on race.
Nick Barry, Senior Counsel at AFL, commented, “If a public school district can openly run discipline and employment systems through a racial filter, then the rule of law means nothing. This is discrimination, plain and simple.” His statement captures the crux of the complaint—asserting that under these policies, true equality is compromised and a culture of bias is perpetuated.
According to the complaint, a deeper examination reveals additional troubling incidents. Following a video surfacing during Thanksgiving break, three female students were disciplined for using racially charged language while intoxicated. Two of the students depicted in the video, one White and one Hispanic, faced disciplinary action alongside an Asian student who recorded their encounter. Conversely, another Black student engaged in similar behavior but went unpunished, raising critical questions about the district’s disciplinary protocols.
Details in AFL’s complaint indicate the school administration’s reluctance to confront misconduct if it implicates Black students. The former Campus Assistant Principal allegedly directed staff not to document issues electronically to avoid negative media attention. This behavior suggests a deliberate effort to obscure the district’s handling of race-related disciplinary matters.
Moreover, the complaint claims that retaliation against staff members who speak out against these policies is rampant. Pat Hogarty, a former Dean of Students, reportedly faced repercussions after he defended his beliefs during DEI training. His assertion of identifying as an American and his love for the country prompted criticism from the district’s executives, who labeled his comments as having “racist undertones.” A month later, Hogarty’s position was eliminated, purportedly due to budget cuts. Yet, this timing raises suspicions that his dismissal was linked to his expressed views.
The implications of these allegations extend beyond individual incidents. They challenge the principles of fairness and equal treatment in a public education system, especially one that receives federal funding and is bound by regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. AFL’s request for an investigation from the Department of Education and the Department of Justice underscores the potential consequences of these practices if confirmed.
The Cherry Creek School District has remained silent on the allegations, stating that it had “no knowledge of” the AFL’s complaint. Such a response—or lack thereof—does little to quell public concern or clarify the school’s position on the matter. With an organization like America First Legal demanding accountability, this situation will likely remain under scrutiny.
The overarching theme of this complaint raises critical questions about equity within school environments. As discussions about DEI initiatives continue to proliferate, instances highlighting bias in enforcement unintentionally contribute to the narrative of division rather than unity. In the case of Cherry Creek, these allegations challenge stakeholders—parents, educators, and students alike—to reflect on their roles in fostering a genuinely inclusive educational atmosphere.
Pat Hogarty’s experience is particularly telling of a larger trend where dissenting voices face backlash in their professional environments. His situation serves as a reminder of how challenging it can be to navigate the complexities of race and discipline in educational settings, and it raises the stakes for those involved in challenging the status quo.
The ramifications for Cherry Creek School District could be significant if these claims are substantiated. Not only could the district face a loss of federal funding, but it may also have to undergo extensive reforms to ensure compliance with civil rights legislation. As the details continue to unfold, the actions of both the school district and federal institutions will be pivotal in shaping the future of discipline policies in education, which must align with the fundamental principles of equality and justice for all students.
"*" indicates required fields
