According to a RealClearInvestigations report, the financial dealings of Stacey Abrams’ nonprofit, Fair Fight Action, are coming under scrutiny. The organization reportedly paid more than $20.2 million in legal fees to Lawrence & Bundy LLC. Co-founded by Allegra Lawrence-Hardy, a close friend and former campaign chair of Abrams, this significant expenditure raised red flags among ethics experts. Much of the legal fees went toward a voting rights lawsuit against Georgia initiated in 2018, which was dismissed in 2022 due to insufficient evidence of discriminatory practices.

The hefty legal bills have prompted concerns regarding conflicts of interest and self-dealing. Paul Kamenar from the National Legal and Policy Center highlighted the incongruity of spending over $20 million on legal fees, particularly when the state’s defense costs amounted to only about $6 million. Kamenar stated, “Twenty million in fees is outrageous,” noting that such expenses could suggest waste of nonprofit assets, which could be seen as an IRS violation.

Adding further complexity, Abrams and Lawrence-Hardy not only share a history but also business ties and office space. Their intertwined connections call into question whether Fair Fight Action, which was structured to avoid pecuniary gain for individuals, has strayed from its intended mission. The articles of incorporation for Fair Fight Action stipulated that the organization would not operate for profit, yet the significant financial transactions raise eyebrows about compliance with this mission.

Kamenar went on to elaborate on the implications of these relationships. He argued that hiring a close friend as lead counsel in such high-profile litigation presents a troubling conflict of interest. The intertwining of personal friendships with nonprofit activities can blur ethical lines, creating a perception that Abrams may have used her organization to benefit friends financially. He concluded, “These businesses raise more suspicion that Abrams used her nonprofit [Fair Fight] to enrich her friends and herself,” indicating a clear breach of ethical standards.

Stacey Abrams has publicly acknowledged Lawrence-Hardy in her 2022 book, “Level Up: Rise Above The Hidden Forces Holding Your Business Back,” where she expressed gratitude for the support she received from Lawrence-Hardy and others during their shared endeavors. This shows not only a personal connection but also an investment in their professional relationship.

The implications of these financial dealings extend beyond mere numbers. During a 2018 voting rights lawsuit, Lawrence-Hardy referred to the situation in Georgia as “a modern-day Jim Crow.” However, the response from U.S. District Judge Steve C. Jones pointedly rejected this claim, noting that Fair Fight had failed to provide direct evidence that any voter was unable to cast their ballot due to supposedly racist laws.

Furthermore, these developments were exacerbated in a 2022 remark by Xakota Espinoza, a communications director for Fair Fight Action. She inadvertently acknowledged the deep ties between Fair Fight Action and Lawrence-Hardy, emphasizing that they were “honored” to be represented by her as lead counsel. Similarly, Dara Lindenbaum, who had served as general counsel for Abrams’ campaign and Fair Fight Action, defended the choice of Lawrence-Hardy for her legal expertise and respect in Georgia’s law community.

In summary, the controversy surrounding Fair Fight Action underscores serious ethical questions about financial management within nonprofits, particularly those with a political agenda. The tangled relationships and substantial legal fees paint a troubling picture of how such organizations may operate, drawing skepticism from professionals and observers alike. The ongoing scrutiny will likely impact the public’s perception of Fair Fight Action and its leadership, as well as the broader conversation about the integrity of nonprofit organizations engaged in political advocacy.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should The View be taken off the air?*
This poll subscribes you to our premium network of content. Unsubscribe at any time.

TAP HERE
AND GO TO THE HOMEPAGE FOR MORE MORE CONSERVATIVE POLITICS NEWS STORIES

Save the PatriotFetch.com homepage for daily Conservative Politics News Stories
You can save it as a bookmark on your computer or save it to your start screen on your mobile device.