President Trump’s frustration over blocked U.S. attorney nominations in Democrat-controlled states highlights a significant challenge he faces. Some of his supporters, however, appear to misdirect their anger toward Senator Chuck Grassley, an influential ally in Congress. Understanding Grassley’s role reveals how integral he has been in advancing Trump’s agenda.
Chuck Grassley is not only a long-standing member of the Senate; he’s recognized as a savvy legislator and a dedicated workhorse. While he avoids the spotlight, his efforts have consistently yielded substantial victories for Trump, particularly in judicial appointments. Grassley played a pivotal role in bringing three Supreme Court Justices into position, with Gorsuch benefitting from his refusal to allow Merrick Garland’s nomination during Obama’s tenure. This maneuver prevented a perceived progressive stronghold on the Court.
Moreover, Grassley proved essential during the turbulent Kavanaugh confirmation process. His steady leadership kept the process moving despite numerous attacks on Kavanaugh’s character and fitness for the bench. Grassley’s commitment to exposing partisan lawfare has made him a reliable figure in the ongoing political battles surrounding Trump and his supporters.
Through Grassley, the public learned of critical investigations like those pursued by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Whistleblowers at the FBI approached Grassley, believing he was the only senator to effectively cooperate in bringing their concerns to light. He has exposed efforts to spy on Republican representatives and track down records of Trump administration officials. His work has made clear the considerable lengths to which the Biden administration will go against its political opponents.
In terms of judicial confirmations, Grassley’s performance remains noteworthy. He has been confirming judges at a faster rate compared to Trump’s first administration. His recent confirmations include flipping the Third Circuit to one dominated by Republican-appointed judges. Grassley also efficiently pushed through critical appointments for roles like Attorney General and FBI Director. These efforts demonstrate his ability to navigate through opposition and advance the president’s judicial objectives.
Despite this, obstacles remain. Some of Trump’s chosen U.S. attorney nominees have been stalled due to the long-standing blue slip rule, which requires home-state senators’ approval for judicial nominations. Critics may overlook the complexities of this rule and mistakenly believe Grassley can bypass it at will. However, Grassley’s influence cannot unilaterally change the dynamics at play: he needs the backing of other Senate members to move nominees forward.
Senators Thom Tillis and John Kennedy have expressed their reluctance to confirm nominees without proper blue slips in place. Their stances demonstrate that many senators—both Republican and Democrat—value the blue slip as a means to exert influence over judicial appointments. During his tenure, even Dick Durbin struggled to abolish the rule despite pressure from progressive activists.
While there are arguments against the blue slip rule, its elimination is not straightforward. Both parties recognize its importance in maintaining a balance of power. Republicans previously utilized it to block numerous Biden appointments. When it comes to the political landscape, many senators prioritize their influence in nominee selection over a blanket process established solely by the president.
This complex scenario underscores Grassley’s precarious position. Though he shares Trump’s frustrations regarding the stalled nominees, he is bound by the reality of Senate votes. There is no current path to abolishing the blue slip, leaving the president in a challenging situation. Grassley understands that votes are essential for moving litigation forward and recognizes a need for action; however, building consensus will be critical.
In summary, Trump should maintain trust in Grassley’s judgment, as the senator has demonstrated a relentless commitment to advancing the president’s agenda. Grassley represents a crucial ally in navigating complex judicial confirmations and ensuring the integrity of appointments in the face of intense partisan opposition. Should Trump recognize this, it might bolster his approach as he continues to challenge the system.
"*" indicates required fields
