Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey narrowly secured a third term, defeating state senator Omar Fateh in a highly contested election characterized by allegations of favoritism and campaign missteps. The election results, verified on November 4, 2025, revealed Frey clinching 53% of the vote after a series of ranked-choice counts, while Fateh garnered 47%. This marked a record turnout, with over 147,000 residents participating, reflecting heightened engagement in local politics.
Fateh’s campaign was marred by severe internal strife within the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party. Although initially endorsed by the local Minneapolis chapter, that backing was revoked by state party leaders just a month later due to concerns about the endorsement process. Issues such as technical malfunctions during online registration and allegations of improper safeguards raised doubts about the integrity of the endorsement. This turn of events significantly undermined Fateh’s position.
Compounding these issues, Fateh’s campaign faced a fine for continuing to display the withdrawn endorsement in his materials, highlighting a crucial error that likely cost him credibility at a vital stage in the race. His progressive platform sought to address serious urban challenges, promising ambitious housing reforms and a reimagined public safety model that distanced the city from traditional policing methods. He also rallied specific demographics, including younger voters and members of the Somali-American community.
Criticism of Fateh often came from conservative commentators, notably Charlie Kirk, who characterized him as part of an “Islamic takeover.” Such remarks, coupled with graffiti attacks on his campaign office, exposed the hostile environment surrounding his candidacy. Fateh himself noted, “I was targeted by Islamophobic language,” pointing to the fear that permeates his community, where residents feel threatened by federal immigration enforcement.
In contrast, Frey navigated the race with a more moderate and stable approach. He promised to advance public safety and consistent governance while appealing to more affluent neighborhoods, thus gathering votes from eliminated centrist candidates in the ranked-choice process. His strategy allowed him to ride on a wave of establishment support and the desire for reliable leadership following the upheaval caused by past incidents associated with the police.
The divisive nature of this election highlighted deep schisms within the Democratic base. Frey’s victory echoed a preference for continuity and moderation in leadership amidst ongoing debates about policing and housing. Fateh’s alliances with influential local figures did not translate into sufficient electoral strength, illustrating the challenges faced by progressive candidates in a divided party.
Fateh’s defeat may momentarily stall his political ascent but could also bolster his resolve to influence future discussions. His previous legislative successes, such as legalizing fentanyl test strips and promoting tuition-free access to public colleges, showcase a commitment to significant social issues. Nevertheless, lingering concerns over campaign violations and perceptions of missteps might haunt his legacy moving forward.
Meanwhile, Frey reinforced his political stance, pledging to prioritize housing in his final term. His determination to continue as a sanctuary city leader amid federal criticisms was evident in his assertion regarding potential repercussions: “Donald Trump can arrest me. Bring it on.” This boldness indicates a commitment to uphold progressive values in the face of mounting scrutiny.
As analysts reflect on the election, they note the significance of voter turnout, which reached a record high. This engagement marks a pivotal moment for Minneapolis, suggesting that substantive discussions around city governance and the Democratic Party’s direction are far from over.
Fateh’s commentary in his concession speech underscored his role in the broader narrative of change: “They may have won this race, but we have changed the narrative about what kind of city Minneapolis can be.” Still, for conservative critics like JD Vance, this election encapsulated a larger cultural confrontation—an ongoing debate about immigration, identity, and the priorities of the American electorate. Vance’s pointed remark linking Fateh to Mogadishu reinforces a sentiment among certain voters that the political landscape is shifting away from traditional American values.
While the implications of these discussions continue to unfold, one truth remains: the struggle over Minneapolis’ identity and its political leadership is far from settled, and voices from both sides will keep echoing in the city’s civic dialogue.
"*" indicates required fields
