Former CIA Director John Brennan is indicted as a central figure in what many refer to as the “Deep State.” This characterization aligns with a narrative viewing Brennan’s actions as harmful to the integrity of the U.S. political system. The article uses assertive language, employing terms like “steal, cheat, lie, and leak” to convey a sense of betrayal among prominent intelligence leaders.
The author emphasizes Brennan’s specific actions during the drafting of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which claimed that Russia sought to aid Donald Trump’s election bid in 2016. The structure is methodical, listing five critical points that demonstrate Brennan’s misconduct. Each point builds on the previous, suggesting a systematic effort by Brennan to undermine Trump. The facts support the assertion that Brennan manipulated intelligence processes for personal or political gain, rather than for the good of the country.
First, the claim that Brennan lied about his familiarity with the discredited Steele dossier raises questions about his credibility and integrity. According to the article, this alleged deceit was compounded by a conscious decision to include the dossier against his advisors’ warnings, demonstrating a reckless disregard for factual accuracy. The author asserts that this decision was primarily motivated by a desire for narrative alignment, not legitimacy.
The second point discusses how Brennan purportedly sidelined other intelligence agencies from the drafting process of the ICA. His actions not only deviated from established protocols but also served to consolidate power within the CIA, raising concerns about accountability and oversight in intelligence operations.
The third allegation, regarding his interference during the ICA’s drafting, suggests that Brennan’s close involvement compromised the thoroughness and objectivity of the analysis. This further emphasizes a critical lapse in the integrity of the intelligence process, where bias may have undermined a vital function of national security.
The timeframe for completing the ICA, seen as rushed, indicates a sense of urgency to produce politically advantageous results. This point resonates with frustrations expressed by analysts who felt pressured, reflecting poorly on Brennan’s leadership and prioritization of political goals over sound intelligence procedures.
The fifth point is particularly striking; the article claims Brennan and then-FBI Director James Comey disseminated the ICA not to inform necessary parties but to facilitate leaks that would ultimately damage Trump’s administration. This characterization suggests a coordinated effort to use intelligence as a weapon against political opponents, framing Brennan and his associates as having engaged in a “coup” rather than legitimate investigative activity.
Throughout the piece, supporting quotes from individuals like Bryan Dean Wright and General Mike Flynn are included to bolster the author’s claims. These voices lend credibility to the narrative that Brennan acted outside his responsibilities, which many believe warrants serious consequences, including imprisonment. The emotional weight of the closing arguments underscores outrage at perceived injustices perpetrated in the name of political expediency.
In summary, the article offers a pronounced critique of John Brennan, painting him as emblematic of Deep State overreach. By leveraging structured arguments about specific actions and decisions, the author compels readers to reconsider their perceptions of Brennan’s legacy. The insistence on justice for perceived wrongs taps into a broader sentiment of frustration regarding accountability in Washington. The final calls for action underscore a passionate demand for restoration of integrity within the intelligence community.
"*" indicates required fields
