Vice President JD Vance’s recent remarks at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest in Phoenix sparked considerable attention and debate. Addressing a crowd of over 30,000 young conservatives, Vance affirmed, “The only thing that has truly served as an anchor of the United States of America is that we have been, and by the grace of God, we always will be, a Christian nation.” This assertion underscored a strong belief in America’s Christian identity, significantly enhancing his profile among conservatives, especially in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the organization’s founder and prominent voice for Christian values.
Vance’s comments resonated deeply, demonstrated by the thunderous applause he received. He elaborated, stating, “Christianity is America’s creed,” and argued that the principles rooted in Christianity thread through the nation’s foundational structure. His view posits that the ethical and moral systems American society operates under—such as the understanding of natural law, the duty to help neighbors, and the protection of the weak—are profoundly influenced by Christian doctrine. Vance emphasized that even the idea of religious liberty is a Christian tenet, encapsulating a view that connects faith directly to the very essence of American governance.
However, the reaction to Vance’s statements was also marked by sharp criticism. Detractors pointed to historical documents as evidence against his claims, invoking the secular nature of the U.S. Constitution and the First Amendment’s establishment clause. Specifically, platforms like the Maddow blog emphasized Thomas Jefferson’s famous quote about a wall of separation between church and state. Critics suggest that accepting Vance’s premise requires ignoring foundational principles established by the nation’s framers, who allegedly intended for America to function as a secular government.
Yet, a closer examination of America’s founding documents reveals significant Christian references that inform the nation’s core identity. The Declaration of Independence notably mentions God multiple times. For instance, it refers to “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” and insists that “all men are created equal… endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” Such language, dated “in the Year of our Lord,” suggests a recognition of divine influence on human affairs that contrasts with a purely secular interpretation.
Furthermore, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which was re-enacted by the First Congress, explicitly states, “Religion, morality, and knowledge… shall forever be encouraged.” This aligns with Vance’s assertion on the necessity of Christian principles as a foundation for governance and societal well-being. The U.S. Constitution, while less religious in its language than some state constitutions, still includes references with overt Christian origins, such as the date marking it “in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven.”
Additionally, references from The Federalist Papers further reinforce religious sentiment among America’s founders. Numbers 2 and 37 reference Providence’s hand in America’s continuity and relief during turbulent times. Authors like Hamilton, Madison, and Jay articulated their faith clearly, recognizing Christianity as pivotal for moral and ethical governance. Hamilton described Christianity as “the best and purest religion,” while Madison asserted that belief in a God is essential to a moral world. Jay called the Bible “the best of all books,” further cementing the connection between Christianity and the American ethos.
Even George Washington, in his Inaugural Address, implored the need to acknowledge “the invisible hand which conducts the Affairs of men.” His closing line—the Presidential Oath, “So help me God”—has been a consistent feature from Washington onward, emphasizing the expectation that leaders publicly acknowledge their faith.
Thus, while criticisms of Vance’s statement focus on a secular interpretation of the Constitution, the echoes of Christian thought within America’s fundamental documents reveal a complex interplay between faith and governance. Vance’s remarks invite a broader discussion about the nation’s identity and the role of religion in public life. This conversation, reignited by his speech, reflects not just a debate about history, but about the values that continue to shape American identity today.
"*" indicates required fields
