Kamala Harris made an appearance on the ‘Rich Little Broke Girls’ podcast recently and ignited quite a stir with her dating advice for young women. Known for her unique laugh, she combined light-hearted counsel with what some critics describe as incoherent remarks. Her laughter, a subject of scrutiny, intermingles with her insights, creating a bizarre but memorable podcast moment.
When asked about criticism surrounding her demeanor, Harris responded, “I don’t aspire to be humble. Humility, yes, is very important.” She associated calls for humility with outdated views on women’s conduct. “To say women should be humble, women should be quiet, women should laugh quietly,” she declared, asserting that it reflects a “dated perspective.” Her insistence that women should embrace humor and assertiveness stands out in a landscape often marred by restrictive gender norms.
In an unexpected twist, Harris’s dating advice also ventured into the realm of personal relationships. She encouraged women seeking companionship to pick partners who appreciate their abilities to laugh at themselves, whether on casual grocery runs or leisurely strolls. “Maybe you’re going to choose that you want to have that kind of Friday night relationship or you want that Sunday morning relationship,” she suggested, indicating a more whimsical approach to romantic partnerships.
What’s consistent in Harris’s discourse is her insistence on laughter, a trait she attributes to her roots. “Like, apparently, some people love to talk about the way I laugh,” she mentioned in past interviews. “Well, let me just tell you something: I have my mother’s laugh.” This connection to her heritage and the importance of joy aligns with her earlier remarks about sexism and public perception.
Moreover, her reaction to criticism of her laugh underscores a recurring theme in her narrative. Harris frames these critiques as rooted in sexism, attempting to shift focus back to her authenticity. “I grew up around a bunch of women, in particular, who laughed from the belly,” she noted, reinforcing her claim that such outbursts reflect genuine emotion rather than superficiality.
Ultimately, Harris’s mix of dating wisdom and unapologetic laughter being perceived as a liability rather than a strength speaks volumes about societal expectations. Critics may use her animated demeanor as fodder for mockery, but Harris reframes it as an expression of identity, resilience, and humor.
As the podcast moment played out, one could not help but recognize the dissonance between her vibrant personality and the notions of what a woman—and a potential leader—should embody. Amidst this dialogue, many may reflect on their own reactions to her message, questioning whether laughter and levity can coexist with the weight of public office.
"*" indicates required fields
