Conservative commentator Matt Van Swol has provided a sharp critique of what he sees as the left’s strategic objectives. Once an outspoken liberal himself, Van Swol’s transformation into a conservative voice highlights his unique perspective rooted in firsthand experience. With a significant following on the social media platform X, he now uses his platform to share insights on political realities.
On December 16, 2025, Van Swol articulated his views on the left’s agenda in a direct tweet. “The goals of the Left have never been more clear, in my opinion,” he wrote, listing five distinct points: mass migration, mass gun control, mass release of violent criminals, mass social welfare, and mass control. Through this lens, Van Swol asserts that these goals are not merely theoretical; rather, they’re observable trends within current Democratic policies.
One of the key points in Van Swol’s analysis revolves around immigration. He argues that the left’s approach to border control aims to secure electoral advantages through mass migration. This tactic, according to Van Swol, suggests that if American voters do not favor Democratic candidates, the solution for the left is to import individuals who will. This assertion raises questions about the integrity of democratic processes and points to a potential undermining of local voter bases.
Van Swol’s second point focuses on gun control, an issue that remains highly contentious in American society. He argues that tragedies are exploited by the left to push disarmament among law-abiding citizens. “The use of such appalling events to drive an agenda raises serious ethical concerns,” he remarks. The discourse surrounding gun violence often obscures the complexities involved, as the media emphasizes particular narratives that fit the left’s ideology while ignoring broader patterns in crime.
On the topic of criminal justice, Van Swol discusses the trend of releasing violent offenders under the guise of social justice. He reflects on the case of DeCarlos Brown Jr., who allegedly attacked Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska. Van Swol points out that judicial leniency towards individuals with extensive criminal histories shows a pattern where responsibility is not placed on the offenders but rather on systemic failures. He captures the frustration many feel regarding accountability—or lack thereof—and argues that the left’s view of these criminals as mere victims enables cycles of crime.
Next, Van Swol examines the welfare state and its creation of dependency. He articulates a view that a society reliant on extensive government support relinquishes freedom, as bureaucrats increase their hold over essential needs such as housing and healthcare. This dynamic, he contends, breeds vulnerability and undermines personal autonomy, as flowery promises of equality often lead only to widespread misery and dependence.
Finally, Van Swol’s argument regarding “mass control” asserts a concerning narrative that transcends specific policies. He suggests a systemic loss of agency among citizens, where individuals lack the power to influence their leaders, protect their rights, or even defend their homes. The threat, he implies, is not simply one of incompetence but may reflect a darker ambition to dismantle core American values.
In sum, Van Swol’s take serves as a call to critically engage with the evolving political landscape. Each of his points resonates deeply with ongoing national debates and underscores a divide that appears to grow ever wider. Whether viewed as an honest examination of policies or a partisan critique, his insights clearly echo the sentiments of a significant segment of the populace, raising vital questions about the direction the country is heading.
"*" indicates required fields
