The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has introduced a new initiative to combat fare evasion: AI-enabled “swing” gates. These high-tech barriers promise enhanced safety and accessibility but have quickly faced scrutiny. A viral video depicted a man bypassing the gates with ease, raising doubts about their effectiveness. Such incidents spotlight potential flaws in a system that claims to improve fare compliance while also costing the city over $7 million.
Concerns about safety and usability have already emerged. One case involved a woman getting her head stuck in the gate, a situation that reflects not only on the technology, but also on its impact on everyday users. These early mishaps raise important questions about the design of these turnstiles and their capacity to function effectively in real-world conditions.
On December 19, 2023, the MTA began rolling out swing gates at two specific stations in Manhattan and the Bronx as part of a broader strategy aimed at reducing fare evasion—a trend that cost the agency nearly $1 billion in 2024. The swing gates incorporate transparent barriers and advanced sensors to detect proper fare payment, designed to improve accessibility for those with strollers, wheelchairs, or large bags.
Jamie Torres-Springer, the MTA’s president of construction and development, highlighted the features of the gates, mentioning that they emit loud alarms during fare evasion attempts. Despite this, initial use indicates that riders have found ways around the barriers—some slipping underneath or climbing over them. Such actions call into question the effectiveness of technology in preventing fare evasion and whether these barriers genuinely enhance security.
The planned expenditure on these gates, despite sounding significant, is merely a fraction of the MTA’s capital improvement budget, which allocates over $1.2 billion for various upgrades. The new gates combine advanced technology with deterrence tactics intended to mitigate fare evasion while maintaining a welcoming atmosphere for riders. However, the implementation of the gates has already faced criticism amid reports of people successfully shirking fare obligations just days into their operation.
In a troubling observation post-rollout, reporters witnessed several fare evaders bypassing the gates entirely, while others struggled with the new design. An incident involving a rider’s backpack getting stuck further illustrates the practical concerns surrounding this initiative. Health, safety, and convenience in utilizing public transit must be balanced against security measures; thus far, these new turnstiles have struggled in that regard.
“No system is going to be 100% immune to fare evasion,” Torres-Springer acknowledged. Yet, he asserted that the technology aims to greatly reduce instances of fare evasion. This hopeful outlook, however, does not absolve the numerous failures documented within days of the rollout. The MTA’s dual approach also includes physical deterrents, such as metal spikes designed to block fare evaders, though evidence shows that even these measures face challenges as determined riders find ways to circumvent them.
The estimated fare evasion in the subways alone was staggering, equating to roughly 330 unpaid rides every minute in 2024. This issue threatens the viability of the MTA’s budget and the quality of public transit services. With significant portions of their operating budget relying on fare revenue, any drop in compliance has serious implications.
The MTA’s multifaceted strategy to combat fare evasion also emphasizes the need for more enforcement measures. The rise in civil summonses reflects an attempt to address the ongoing theft of revenue. However, reports of declines in fare evasion have been met with skepticism given the persistent incidents of bypassing barriers.
Accessibility advocates have challenged the design of the swing gates even as the MTA promotes them as a significant advance. Quemuel Arroyo, the MTA’s Chief Accessibility Officer, voiced support for the newly designed gates, emphasizing their ambition for inclusiveness. Still, skepticism remains, particularly fueled by the viral footage of easy evasion and everyday riders’ experiences with the new gates. Doubts about whether the investment will truly lead to reductions in fare evasion may overshadow the potential benefits.
Understandably, for many riders who are already feeling the pressures of service delays and infrastructure issues, concerns about fare evasion and the MTA’s responses are pressing. The potential for fare hikes or service cuts looms if compliance does not improve. An MTA spokesperson underscored the financial stakes, noting, “If the system loses money to people who skip paying, legitimate riders may face cuts or fare hikes.”
As the MTA continues its installation efforts at more subway stations and tracks the performance of the new gates, the effectiveness of these measures remains in question. The unfolding narrative around the swing gates serves as an ongoing experiment in harmonizing security, accessibility, and efficiency in public transit. Until an effective balance is reached, the image of someone slipping through a costly barrier will remain a persistent reminder of the challenges the MTA faces in curbing fare evasion.
"*" indicates required fields
