George Soros has poured significant funds into the campaign of New York Attorney General Letitia James, as recent state finance records reveal a more than $71,000 investment since 2019. Such backing raises questions about the influence of wealthy individuals in political campaigns. The amounts reported include an $18,000 donation from Soros to James in July 2024 and another $13,000 from his daughter-in-law, Jennifer Soros, in May of the same year. Earlier contributions from the Soros family add up to a hefty $40,000, bolstering James’ financial support.
Notably, Soros’ donations do not fully capture the extent of his influence. Organizations he funds, especially the Working Families Party (WFP), also provide political support. Not only has Soros fueled this party with approximately $23.7 million since 2016 through his Open Society network, but he and his family have directly donated at least $865,000 to its New York affiliate since 2018. This illustrates how interconnected finances and political ambitions can shape the landscape.
James’ political path is closely linked to the WFP. Her rise began in 2003 when she won a City Council seat as their first-backed candidate. Despite not running under the WFP banner during her successful 2018 campaign for attorney general, she returned to the party’s fold for her 2022 re-election, highlighting the ongoing relationship. This alignment has morphed her into a prominent figure not only in New York politics but also in national discussions regarding the prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
Her pursuit against Trump has been anything but traditional law enforcement. The attempts to legally challenge him reflect a strategy aligned with her political base, which is notably opposed to Trump. Yet this campaign has seen setbacks, with an appellate court overturning over $500 million in penalties previously imposed. The narrative of James as a fierce opponent of Trump has been complicated by her own legal troubles. After the DOJ investigated allegations of misleading information on her mortgage application, she was indicted on fraud charges. Although she pleaded not guilty, a judge dismissed the case based on the unlawful appointment of the U.S. attorney involved.
This series of events, coupled with two Grand Jury refusals to indict her, raises critical questions about accountability. The intertwining of James’ legal challenges with her political ambitions further complicates her career. At the same time, the substantial financial backing from Soros points to the broader issue of how money influences accountability in the political arena.
Turning to Soros’ other political engagements, his financial support extends to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg as well. A $1 million donation to Color of Change’s political action committee in 2021 helped fund Bragg’s campaign efforts. Besides that, Soros and his family have contributed over $43,000 directly to Bragg. These allocations follow a pattern of targeting crucial legal positions in cities across America, amplifying the argument that impactful money in politics can shape not only campaigns but also legal outcomes.
In summary, the considerable financial support from Soros to James highlights the intricate relationship between wealthy donors and political power. It raises awareness of the forces at play behind the figures attempting to influence public policy. As Mary Ellen Wright of The New York Post noted, the flow of funds from one family into the political arena underscores a broad and concerning trend that sometimes blurs the line between political action and legal accountability.
"*" indicates required fields
